/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25308454

I think this is one of the main things fucking up men. We live in a world where even the most soi men could easily overpower and kill 95% of women, yet are so terrified of them some can't even leave their bedroom. All discourse between men is moderated by the fact that there's always the underlying understanding that the conversation could end in violence. Civilization isn't our natural state and outside of it men would seek to attain dominance by using primarily violence to secure enough resources (food, water, shelter) for them and their offspring. This is probably where men's desire to reproduce with many women comes from, there would be far less men alive in that situation and the ones that were alive would most likely be extremely violent (depending on scarcity of resources) as a necessity. Men would also had harems of sorts due to the stronger male being able to defeat others and take their resources, sort of like how a wild stallion's females will leave him for the winner if he's defeated and loses control of the water source. They'd need the protection from other men and predators. Women have it ingrained in them that it's very possible their current male would be killed / defeated, so they have to be able to quickly move on, and they're loyal to their offspring, not their race or partner, which is why when western men become betas they start advocating for importing barbarians because it increases their options. The ultimate conclusion of males would be Genghis Khan. For women it's the reverse, maximum hypergamy to maximize number of offspring from different chads.

Lack of being able to use violence to gather and protect resources is probably what contributes to consumerism, people can buy their food and shelter, they don't have to earn it in the natural sense of the word. They keep buying more and more to try and fill the void, and work hard on finances simply in order to keep up with the inability to feel satisfied on an evolutionary level.

>>24948769

>Ideology warfare has ended
>We are now at the end game of class warfare

Ideology warfare has not ended because you just said it's the end game of class warfare, which is textbook communism. Communism is simply the noticing of the pattern that as social mobility increases, the best stock of the lower class can rise up and mate with a higher status female, while the weakest of the upper classes can fail, and end up mating with a lower class person. Eventually the genetic garbage collects at the bottom, and as the smarter people push civilization further, it becomes too much for the people at the bottom to deal with, so they seek to smash society and bring it back down to their intellectual level. This is a natural phenomenon, but Jewish interests harnessed it.

Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the Jewish plan. One funnels wealth to the top slowly enough to not cause riots, the other convinces the people whose futures have been stolen that the upper middle class stole it, and encourages them to rise up and take it.

Marxism is also in play because up to a point there were two groups of Marxists, ones whose goal was improving conditions for the working class, and one whose goal was to implement Communism. Until Capitalism begun to improve worker conditions, these goals were essentially the same thing. That's when the Frankfurt school split off.

Fascism, and also National Socialism, were founded economically on the basis that all of those ideologies are not only incorrect, but designed specifically to inflict suffering on the people of a nation. Ideologies are more relevant than ever because unless you understand the psychological preconditions for believing those ideologies you'll never understand how they brainwash people, and by extension, how to stop it.