/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55797445
computer

>>51368498
so if you bought 2025 leaps, would that be smart or what i dont know anything about options btw

>>13417702
not the floppy bullshit again, that comparison is so dumb. even IF it was true we can never uncap the blocks there is no reason to not increase it by, say a 1.25 multiplier per year or something, at least up to the current max support 32 MB (in the protocol TODAY). you'd get 15 years to make a 2nd layer solution that actually works, all while allowing BTC to grow.

just imagine the resources a global economic system would get. youtube needs what, 2 GB of storage per second? 2 TB of bandwidth per second? and that's not 30 years into the future. thinking your neighbour would run a bitcoin node at home in 30 years if it actually would be the global economy is not thinking straight.

miss me with that gay argument. all we wanted was 2 MB blocks to begin with and bitcoin cash wouldnt even have existed, niggers in africa can download 2 MB in 10 minutes. it was calculated that blocks would get full within 2 years back in 2015 and they did get full and blockstream ignored it because of ulterior motives.

>>13417720
i dont have any direct examples to feed you but places that uses https://www.coinpayments.net/supported-coins or other similar services.