/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52277198
ah i see, but nodes dumped on the market in various amounts so who knows, nothingburger info.
>>52277168
about 50$ it was top mania doge coin, so who knows if it was real or not, pure euphoria all around the world, but judging by that vicious drop after, and looking at crypto with all the liquidations i dont know what to believe any more. definetely was suprised that everything was dropping like a stone, and i wouldnt ever risk so much money in this market ever again unless FED turns on the QE infinity, UBI, and negative rates. learning about 2018 rates, 2019 repo crisis opened my mind to the possiblity that markets all around the world are just derivatives of USD dominance. if FED will go 50bps in December we might have a pop, but 2023 might be 2018 deja vu with everything dropping from spring onwards for a year. monetary system is fuckin depressing, and with degen leverages in crypto there's always possibility of everything going to zero circa march 2020 crash. only thing thats keeping it from it, is unregulated casinos turning off exchanges and layering orders in the meantime. going to bed, tomorrow when my deposit hit im buying some LINK.

one more thing about decentralization and regulations. today i was making deposit to exchange, my bank called me we had 10 minute verification chat, they were suprised about destination of bank, they asked me questions do i understand that its a crypto exchange etc. it's the thing that's missing in crypto. SAFETY. i know i'm being taken care of, my money is safe (don't lehman me), and nobody can steal it, empty this account etc. amount was like 10% of my USD holding and still i got a call. how can crypto in current state can compete in terms of safety with that? you misstype/delete one letter while sending crypto and it's poof, gone. in that second you can lose all of this value.its batshit crazy when you look at it and compare it to banking system with all the securities and pro-consumer approach.

Godspeed anons

>>52235834
Yes

>>50078417
I'm here to make money, and sheeps are always wrong. Board cleansed, i had 2 good months, summer is hot, i'm sweating my balls off. I didn't follow the news on LINK, let's discuss shit properly. What's keeping LINK on these prices ? If DeFi already exploded LINK should've exploded with it to 2$.
>>50078473
30C+ , getting tanned, and maybe i have a mild stroke or I'm onto something
>>50078541
what? they unload 50 mil on open market and capping staking at 75 mil or what?

>>24543717
crossing fingers for people who bought those heavy bags.
>t.2800-6000 sats 2018 buyer
>t.2020 august seller

>>24379264
its not a scam but its currently highly overpriced same with BTC.

BAND literally did the same run in 6 months, and released staking to pump price higher and higher locking 80% of supply.

thats how its done.

LINK had first mover advantage, it doesnt mean they will be standard in oracle defi ponzi forever.

Guess You say DeFi in current state with yield farming, useless fuckin vaporwave contracts is valueable and will replace legacy systems.

This was the purpose of LINK to compete with legacy systems for piece of trillion dollars pie.

3 years, and it has ZERO fuckin real world usage. No pie and they have ZERO of my money.

simple as that.

and one more thing, if BTC doesnt break ATH, just like LINK will not break 200$ by January (parabola anon shill prediction), at least say fuckin sorry to gulible anons who you are deluding in this circle jerk.

i dont expect apology from swines like you.

in the hundreds of dollars unironically
Didn't you hear the guy in sibos say we use an oracle? wtf do you think they will use?

>>23031934
>>23031980
>literally showed the trip to counter discord tranny
>trip was active in like 5 threads total
>omg it checks out
>cap provided shows "DONT SELL LINK, DONT FALL FOR FUD" from 1 year ago after another nothinburger conference
>Link literally dumped after it
>oh holy shit attack that dude, he's the worst
combined IQ of you two doesn't reach 3 figures, just like LINK won't ever do.

>>22794659
yeah i know they have limited dev resources thats why Sergey is basically saying that they are hiring and they built "network" and wait for devs to build their shit, since they are open source.

we can go back and forth, with IF's , WHen's and They Will Coms, but it has been 3 years and there's actually ZERO fuckin rock solid cases.

Tsigs was great concept, just like decentralized oracle network was a great concept 3 years ago.

3+3 equals 6 so, get ready for staking,tsigs,working network and first client birthday party cake in 2023.

Ofc cant guarantee that date, and cant guarantee LINK price by then but for sure it will be between 1-1000$.

we are doing MMO RPG Astrology simulation. basically exchanging our money to enter the game, we buy digital currency that can only be used within the game ecosystem, and maybe turning it for profits.

game may be dead, we might switch to different one.

ponzi (at the current state of world usage).

2018 was the shit, fools talking about what can project achieve, and quite frankly, it didnt achieve alot apart from reaching high value in USD so far.

NO FUD just real talk. so far - 20 different pivots in some other ongoing issues etc. meanwhile Band and other so called "competitors" stealing oracle money, and doing 18 cents to 18$ run in 5 months with no tech, no mixiciles no ari jew, no tsigs, no deco, fuckin.

whatever, lets hear some next fuckin bullshit in next couple of weeks, if they even bother announcing anything
>muh no price talk
>muh no announcments of what they buying for money
>muh silent project no hype

3deep5me

>>22662068
well Damian wasn't wrong, market momentum is picking up.

>2019 1,5$
>2020 rona 1,5$
>2020 Q4 ?

closing tab. say hi to 160K anon from me, if he's .....alive

>>22519293
nah im not contrarian, most of the posts come from 3-4 digit LINK soon to be millionaire holders who have zero experience in crypto, and they are just day dreaming. BTC flipped, LINK went parabolic, and what comes after parabolic move is just easy to predict. if you asking anons about trading methodologies, 90% of traders blow off their accounts in first month of trading.

never touched futures in this manipulated shithole, spot trading 10% , 90% long term holds
>>22519355
here have a you "projecting" lmfao
>>22519384
>>22519499
bought 5 digit stack under 50 cents, with lowest buy-in in thousands at 17 cents aka 2018 bottom.
>>22519512
the project was a fuckin schizo meme that only chan understood, so i basically gambled, then i swinged some, and some more, and i started unloading those heavy bags
>100X in some cases bags

and thats all from me folks. have a nice evening

>>22358978
incorrect with all the statements about my well being, but for sure act like you know shit with 2 years experience in the space.

only thing you did is you read my posts in 2018 discussing LINK here, bought it, and now my semen is talking to me through the powers of the internet in 2020.

that semen is you, because i made you son.

>>21302562
dude you realize we are just betting money here ? the final goal in all of the markets is to make money period.

i either made more or less than you, but i was here from 2018, posting in all of those good threads, creating orginal content, making sure anons wont sell the bottom at 1,5$ in both cases.

im not FUDing LINK, never had. market doesnt give a shit about what you feel and if you believe in a project.

are all people were wrong and dumber than us because they bought ICX, TRX, or other scams?

nah, they were wrong because they held too much and bought the peak. whatever it may be.

so im playing my hand safe here, and wishing you all guys luck while simultaneously leaving a good chunk on the table for the last deal of cards while holding a drink in my hand.

Veni, vidi, vici.

>>21236759

>>21226286
almost 6K LINK for 2800 Sats, current price 112944 sats. this is all dedicated to anons who understood LINK potential and shilled it here.

thank you from the bottom of my heart.

>>21164808
there is only one explanation and you faggots didnt post it, fuck you nubiz

>>21129729
this is 27 inch screen smallson, guess you pajeets dont understand perspective.
>185cm
>82kg
>10% BF after this year cut


and now im out for real, have fun in the playground kids.

>>21096770
for now we are feeding prices of crypto into contracts, with network up and running and product tested, audited and without any fuckups.

just because we were here 2018 doesnt mean people buying in today dont understand shit of possibilites of LINK today.

we got first movers advantages because we are autistic, just like Chainlink got first mover advantage on oracles.

we are the Chainlink of Chainlink, but i dont underestimate my opponents in this crypto game.

to summarize, OP is wrong, and statement if false as fuck. dont get caught believing you are elite, because the bigger they are the harder they fall. be humble you little twat

We're here to connect but don't understand how

>>20796272
this is an image board not a fuckin htttps board, cap the good information, do the graphics. on the other hand who the fuck cares, its old news

>>20209208
>Why should we retrace?
there's literally zero fuckin reason fundamentally to retrace a big move now. only thing that those small red candles on 30m charts are doing is shaking out swing linkers aka wannabe traders step by step out of their stacks. day by day LINK is out of exchanges in batches bigger than 99% of people in the world can afford
>>20209262
ive been here longer than you got a hold of google translate you stinky pajeet. go shit in a street somewhere

>>18638479
i literally spammed this cap and added frogs + sergay while you niggas were sleeping on it
>real marine here