/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56561384
>I love how confident you retards are when throwing technobabble around without any deeper understanding of the big picture.

Well, considering Monero has been in continuous use in the darknet economy since 2016 with exactly 0 admins/vendors/users traced, its hard not to be confident.

>>54878025
The problem with that is crypto is nationless. USA can put an iron curtain around itself, but the crypto market, specifically Monero, will fester wherever crime exists. In a situation where there is economic collapse, the police state will shrink. Normoids will have to accept that committing crimes will become a part of everyday life, similar to how everyone speeds and every single cash worker never reports their tips.

>>53097792
> subpar mascot

>>52434624
>do you think there's a chance that Bitcoin implements a lot of Monero's features, like CPU mining, variable block size, encrypted transactions, etc?

lol no, maxipads have been reminding us for years that BTC never hardforking is a feature, not a bug. The loss of credibility would be immense.

But say they did: it would just be seen as a desperate attempt to stay relevant, Team BTC has had many years and multiple opportunities to show that they take privacy seriously e.g. ZeroCoin, Confidential TXs, Dandelion+, they passed on ALL of them.

When the tech you're relying on to keep you out of prison is being by developed by people who treat privacy as an afterthought that they'll "get to eventually" it doesn't exactly inspire confidence. Conversely, Team Monero has an obsessive commitment to privacy and it is prioritized in every consideration and trade off, even if it means getting delisted or outright outlawed.


>And what would happen to Monero in this situation?

Nothing, darknet admins ain't fools.

>>50780375
That's the easy part. The hard part is actually using XMR.