/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49451197
Source? Lay out for me how Hitler's policies were basically the New Deal, and bear in mind I've read extensively on NSDAP economic policies and have all my sources to hand right now, which is why I can comfortably say you're full of shit and won't be able to. Also all that is invalidated because even the Jewish banker backed Schact (who lead the German bank at the time of the Weimar hyperinflation and openly opposed every single successful policy Hitler put into place) stated openly that war production had nothing to do with the economic recovery, meaning even by the standards and words of a vehemently anti-Hitlerist, if Germany had not had to worry about knowing what the bankers had planned and preparing the military as a precaution, the recovery would have been even faster, and prosperity would have continued for the foreseeable future. Any claims to National Socialism "failing" are immediately moot because the experiment was tampered with and forcefully ended before it could reach any form of conclusion by people who didn't like the results. This happens today in the Pharma industry all the time.

>Kid A is taking a test, which he fails miserably. Almost all of the answers are wrong. Kid B is still taking the test and is almost finished with a nearly perfect score, but the rest of the class beats him up and rips his test apart.

Did Kid B fail the test?

>>49428579