/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55971728
The difference is the context.
When your useless shitcoin with mass VC fake advertising goes to 0 it's unrelated.

But when a real product which will change the world and keeps being suppressed by most participants keeps building in silence then it is.
You are getting paid to fud for this exact reason.

Those who hold this project until the end will not be down big but spectacularly in profit.

The current price does not matter because it is only a price disconnected from the real value.
Warren Buffet also said to only invest in projects which you could hold for a decade if the stock market was closed.

Eric Schmidt must have a similar opinion on Chainlink's value, or he would not have became a willing advisor and went multiple times to their SmartCon event.

>>52871828
I didn't know Eric became a janny.

>>52872858
Trading is not drawing lines with no analysis of the TA and context.
Not solving the Linkpool issue will in time create a bigger problem for them which may enable this result, but Bitcoin recovering may avoid this result.

However on a daily basis Chainlink looks like shit and if Sergey does not pump out new hopium in the next 2 days it will trigger a weekly sell signal for Chainlink.
Maybe that will make them remove Johnny when they have to chose between taking a 50% haircut on their token market cap or keeping a scammer in their club.