/biz/ - Business & Finance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKcE_leRHWk

>>23063118
are you an actual schizo?

I'm so jealous of Sergey. I wish my life had as much singular purpose as Sergey's.

I grew up playing NES LoZ1&2. I played N64 zeldas and years later I finally experienced SNES Zelda on emulator.
Link will win

https://cryptoslate.com/chainlink-leads-in-developer-activity-as-link-hits-all-time-highs/

you know what that means right?

This image will be memed into reality.

Flippening when?

https://www.coindesk.com/links-trading-volume-on-coinbase-surpasses-that-of-bitcoin

>>20667858
Thank you Flannelman

Will Chainlink lead the next crypto bubble?

People keep asking "WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON WITH LINK?"

Everyone seems puzzled that it is mooning, despite no recent news. The real question is, "WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON WITH XRP/BCH/BSV/LTC/ADA?"

All of these scams are valued much higher than LINK despite doing absolutely nothing for years. How the fuck is this possible? Bullish AF. LINK will be worth much more than these trash projects in a few weeks.

>>20283951
> Anime
> High IQ
Sounds like something a nico poster would say. I don't get the reference sorry man

Reminder that BSN global commercial launch is scheduled for tomorrow

>>19653613

>>17386416
FUCKING MANIACS

>>17150392
Tonight.

Sergey "Decentralized" Nazarov

>>16092689
>CL is probably a lot more connected with Google than the "it's just a blogpost" faggots are trying to make you believe.

I think you're right. Despite 2 years of mass concentrated autism not a single breadcrumb was ever picked up regarding Chainlink and Google. They are definetely involved deeper behind the scenes. Sergey knows what Google is working on in regards to blockchain which they've been quiet about. This article about Google and Blockchain featuring an interview with Sergey has been forgotten and I think it's implications have been totally underestimated:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrynpollock/2019/07/02/is-google-chasing-the-90-potential-of-blockchain-that-facebook-left-out/#1aba87943185

>Google, as one of the world's leading technology companies, has been viewed as somewhat behind the eightball in the blockchain space. In comparison to IBM, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, and the likes, Google is playing catch up.

>However, Nazarov confirms that there is a growing interest from the internet giant. "There are people in Google that are very interested in blockchain," he added. "The thing with Google is that it is very focused, and they have their systems and processes that lead them to success in a focused way. There are people in Google, and official positions, that I know of that are related to blockchains - and I have seen an increase in that since a year ago."

>"I think the difference between Facebook and Google is that Facebook may have a real interest in payment and crypto stuff, but Google may have an interest in building these highly useful contracts by building useful infrastructure to make that possible."

>>15862230
Basically they overlooked Serg Burg in highschool and ended up fucking Gilles and getting knocked up by his beta sperm and got married... Now after seeing the man Sergey has become they realized they lacked any foresight in future value and now they are SEETHING with jealousy.

they're not going to use highly insecure centralized oracles running on highly secure decentralized infrastructure

>>15462685
>>15462687
Just sharing crumbs or do you know more? Cheers either way, going through it now.

>>14807536
See pic related. You didn't think this was just a meme, right?

>not eating a Big Mac every time LINK hits a new ATH

What if the price of LINK rises, won't that be a problem for the buyers?
>No because muh 18 decimals, magic answer to all questions, buyers will be able to buy in fiat!
That's great, but it's a buyer-seller network, so turning this into a fiat question is advantageous for the buyer, but what about the seller, who still is insuring its node with LINK tokens he market bought?

See the Oracle startups, they're startups, already low on cash. they'll have to market buy their own tokens in the coming months, at the top of a bubble likely to pop. Not only are they not sure selling their data will be profitable, simply operating a node also means potential losses, and then there's the stack itself which is a big investment that could depreciate overnight. What if these 50 startups buy at 4 dollars and the market makes it go back to 30 cents. The collateral becomes worthless and a competitor node who bought at 30 cents will destroy them. Since the system revolves fiat rather than LINK then it's the sellers getting massively burned.