/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54542414
Yes, but only if it also didn't have Craig attached to it. If BSV was called something else and Craig didn't exist then it would be way more successful. But it's trying to larp as BTC and is basically a fork of a fork (a fork off of BCH) and so it gives off a "fake and gay" vibe to 95% of people. And it doesn't help it's controlled by a very unpleasant individual who's anti-White and pro-vaccination and keeps lying and making shit up and faking shit and is pro KYC and pro government regulations and anti anonymity and has glowie connections.

>>54511667
He will never ever sign. Because he will never ever have Satoshi's keys.

>>54505051
>something involving craig
>based
??????????

>>53713474
A "Satoshi" individual never existed. The real "Satoshi" was multiple people; Bitcoin was created by the NSA and possibly several other agencies. It was not a 1-man project. It was a government project.

NSA paper from 1996: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm

>even talks about the "double spend" problem

Interesting to note is that there's a "Tatsuaki Okamoto" there. Not only does Okamoto sound similar to Nakamoto, but if you rearrange the letters a bit you can get pretty close to Satoshi Nakamoto.

TATSUAKI OKAMOTO
SATO__I _AKAMOTO (discarded: T, U and K)

The extra needed letters are S, H and N.

The NSA created SHA 256, which Bitcoin uses.

S and H can be found in "SHA 256".
Remove S and H from "SHA 256" and left is "A 256".
A is the 1st letter of the alphabet.
So "A 256" equals "1 256".
1+2+5+6 equals 14.
The 14th letter of the alphabet is N.
So "1 256" equals N.
So, "SHA 256" = SHN <--- the extra needed letters missing in "SATO__I _AKAMOTO".

But that doesn't matter and doesn't make crypto bad. It's like with the Internet itself which got out of their control. Like the Internet, it wasn't meant to be what it has become. "Crypto" and all these markets weren't supposed exist.

And the glowie Craig Wright of course isn't Satoshi, because a Satoshi individual never existed, however he was later tasked by his (possibly jewish) masters with playing the role of "Satoshi" to keep the "Satoshi the individual" myth alive, and to be a controlled opposition of sorts.

>>53420234
A "Satoshi" individual never existed. The real "Satoshi" was multiple people; Bitcoin was created by the NSA and possibly several other agencies. It was not a 1-man project. It was a government project.

NSA paper from 1996: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm

>even talks about the "double spend" problem

Interesting to note is that there's a "Tatsuaki Okamoto" there. Not only does Okamoto sound similar to Nakamoto, but if you rearrange the letters a bit you can get pretty close to Satoshi Nakamoto.

TATSUAKI OKAMOTO
SATO__I _AKAMOTO (discarded: T, U and K)

The extra needed letters are S, H and N.

The NSA created SHA 256, which Bitcoin uses.

S and H can be found in "SHA 256".
Remove S and H from "SHA 256" and left is "A 256".
A is the 1st letter of the alphabet.
So "A 256" equals "1 256".
1+2+5+6 equals 14.
The 14th letter of the alphabet is N.
So "1 256" equals N.
So, "SHA 256" = SHN <--- the extra needed letters missing in "SATO__I _AKAMOTO".

But that doesn't matter and doesn't make crypto bad. It's like with the Internet itself which got out of their control. Like the Internet, it wasn't meant to be what it has become. "Crypto" and all these markets weren't supposed exist.

And the glowie Craig Wright of course isn't Satoshi, because a Satoshi individual never existed, however he was later tasked by his (possibly jewish) masters with playing the role of "Satoshi" to keep the "Satoshi the individual" myth alive, and to be a controlled opposition of sorts.