/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29359968
>believing bitcoin is defined by the bitcoin whitepaper is cult like behavior

btc doesn't follow a single aspect of the whitepaper
>digital gold
>not peer to peer
>adoption limit
>broken chain of signatures
>no simple payment verification
>nodes don't have hashpower
>high fees

and its development is funded by mastercard, jeffrey epstein and bilderberg group

>>19057742

>>18773180
you may want to read this to see what a node is

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

>>18769162
>digital gold
>adoption limit
>broken chain of signatures
>no simple payment verification
>nodes don't have hashpower
>high fees

how to spot btc

>>18638894
click this
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

it's like core read the first sentence of each section and aimed to make the opposite true for btc

>peer to peer electronic cash
btc is peer to miner to peer electronic gold
>chain of digital signatures
btc has segwit
>a node does work
btc says non mining nodes are nodes
>you don't need to run a node to verify transactions
btc says you need to run a node to verify transactions

bitcoin is the opposite of gold it requires work to remain secure.
gold requires outrageous amounts of work to be made to change.

that is why the title of the whitepaper is Bitcoin: A peer to peer electronic cash system

btc is literally a ponzi scheme. bsv is bitcoin

>>18121384
>satoshi hated banks
zero evidenc of this

>Creg has had opportunity after oportunity to prove he is satoshi
define how someone proves they are satoshi

> nothing has changed
the payee does not receive a signature from the previous owner. It is not a chain of digital signatures.
ib4 witness
the witness is a hash of a signature which is not a signature

>>18059995
0:51

>>18060007
this is why i'm interested, see who's lying. Obviously btc if you meant bsv you'd clarify

>>18060025
>>18060042
agree, but that doesn't mean somethings not going on

>>18011093

>>17998930

>>17998520

>>17992589
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

>peer to peer electronic cash
btc is digital gold and not peer to peer
>we define a coin as a chain of digital signatures
>a payee can verify the signature to verify the chain of ownership
not possible with segwit
>a node works
btc thinks something without hashpower is a node
>you do not need to run a node to verify transactions
btc believes you need to run a non mining node to verify transactions

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Screencap this

bsv is bitcoin

>>17696502
objectively true

>>17695695
it's specification disagrees
>we define a coin as a chain of digital signatures
>a payee can verify the signature to verify the chain of ownership
not true with segwit

>>17531230
BTC
>digital gold not peer to peer electronic cash
>chain of hashes not chain of digital signatures
>payee can't verify chain of signatures
>thinks a node is something without hashpower
>thinks you need to run a node to verify transactions
>No Simple Payment verification
>replace by fee
>144mb/day adoption limit
>lightning network
>disabled op codes

>>17529635
it's almost like you guys just wrote the first sentence of each section of the whitepaper and then made an effort to subvert it

>chain of digital signatures
segwit
>nodes do work
non mining nodes are "full nodes"
>spv
you need to run a node to verify transactions

>>17425877
>specific
>we define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures
changes bitcoin to a chain of hashes of signatures