[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.30291216 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1416108552135.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30291216

Last chance to be fully divested.

>> No.25235204 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1606883277807.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25235204

>>25234697
>safeguard
In that case, you're going to want a Gold ended portfolio; with Silver as your diversification. If you were going for a short-ended portfolio; you'd deifnitely in the reasonable territory for a triple investment (tl;dr G/S, then anything from the Platinum group that takes your fancy, Plat/Pall/Ur/Copp etc)
>Savings Account
Smart idea; unless your rate of interest is higher than the rate of inflation, you'll unironically be losing money for every second it's in there
>Ratio
It' completely up to you, but this is why I say to lurk a little and get a feel for things. Pre-impending crash; the general go-to ratio was ~60/40, going to 60/35/5 if you wanted a tertiary diversification. Now however, it's much more up in the air; where there's solid logic for both an increased ratio of Gold (80/20 max) and Silver (30/70 max). Both have their reasons; but in essence it boils down on if you think Silver is going normalise / the GSR is going to start slipping or if you think the Asians are going to make plays with their Gold reserves to topple the dollar / defaulting contracts are going to spike the price earlier than Silver.
The key point is that both sides have some credit to them, but if you really don't know what the fuck is going on; 60/40 *should* be the middle ground (not optimal as it was before given what we know is going on, but better than nothing).
>The dealer says
Sounds boomerish levels of blind trust; just do your own damn due dilligence; related is the near exact spot price https://goldprice.org/ , use the links in the OP to measure how much the premiums roughly are currently. Remember, this isn't a case of making friends or the like; unless you're going for premiums on coinage, as a general rule just maximise as much weight as you can for the ratio of spending you're going for.

[1/2]

>> No.24664084 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1416108552135.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24664084

>>24664021
I'm just sitting here with my cat kinda lazily browsing around. Sometimes I'll put the phone down and just stare at the trees outside. I don't understand how people can feel "left out" of cities. There's nothing special here for me. I guess we should just switch places... I hope I can be fortunate enough to get off the hamster wheel someday. Maybe move out somewhere kinda cold and just take care of the business that feels right for me.

>> No.7683236 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1518293376194.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7683236

>>7681505
Please tell people how much you are laughing, I bet it really convinces them.

>> No.7533139 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1515793219234.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7533139

>Oh crap
>Login into Poloniex account from years years ago
>Oh right i don't have any funds in here anymore
>Enable 2FA just because

>> No.5125958 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1457894947789.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5125958

>>5125341
>How would you rate yourself?
1 or 2 across the board

>> No.938537 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1416543819734.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
938537

So I was coming home on the train today, and I thought to myself that I really needed to defecate.

Now, if you've ever been to NYC, or really any modern city, you should have seen signs in tons of storefronts that the toilets are only for customers. Which means that each owner was so fed up of people asking to use them without paying that they had to put up a sign. So I was thinking.. is there any city large and busy enough to actually run a literal toilet business? Say, perhaps, smack dab in the middle of Times Square?

Hear me out. No one is going to pay for a toilet like this. But everyone HATES "public" stalls, where there is little to no upkeep and a constant fear of something disgusting happening. So what if it ran on ad revenue? I'm talking wall-to-wall state-of-the-art advertising panels, behind thick, THICK, waterproof, smellproof, glass/plastic. I mean, porn streaming websites make BANK running on ad revenue alone, but they can only attract companies that would sink low enough to advertise to masturbators that aren't really paying attention. But what company, when convinced, could turn down a captive audience in a toilet stall? You could sell literally anything that way. Think of how desperate people are for reading material on the can. Like the demon Belphegor, customers are most willing to think inventively on the toilet.. which means they may think proactively about how a product would be useful to them.

I would hire attentive, 24/7 janitors at the ready to keep the place utterly immaculate day in and day out, and really the only overhead would be water, electricity, rent, and paper.

Thoughts? Hesitations? Early investors? Store titles?

>> No.719389 [View]
File: 1.84 MB, 475x277, 1418780576073.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
719389

>>717542
>#64

Shit I thought my old shithole was worse off. Neat.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]