[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.25003309 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 578.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25003309

>>25001300
If there's one thing congress can agree on, it's to tax the people of the US through inflation, and then hand them back the revenue.

Now that the USD is monopoly money, what should I invest in /biz/?

>> No.13764130 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1516448931638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13764130

Imagine being a stink linker holding this cult bag for years and not cashing out right now at a golden opportunity.
See you at 0.20 cents in tomorrow week losers.

>> No.13744917 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1516448931638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13744917

>>13744860
BASEEEDD

dabbing on the bulltards lmao

>> No.9511707 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 578.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9511707

>Ether Shrooms
>4.2 ETH
>Started today
>Compare to Shrimp 50+ ETH

Hodl a shitcoin for months or x5 your ETH in a couple of days by farming internet mushrooms. Praise capitalism.

http://ethershrooms.surge.sh/? ref=0xbf96d5b7a29545f49ea33f85fb878bd35e649354

>> No.9505199 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 578.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9505199

>"How did you get so rich in crypto, anon? Wasn't there a bear market?

>"W-well you see... there was this game... you click a button and turn spores into mushrooms or another button to sell the spores"

>Literally this easy to beat the bear market

>Mfw biz beat the market manipulators by farming shrimp n' shrooms

http://ethershrooms.surge.sh/? ref=0xbf96d5b7a29545f49ea33f85fb878bd35e649354

>Created today
>Less than 2 ETH

Praise capitalism. Now go dump on Reddit.

>> No.7455019 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1516448931638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7455019

It's hard to hold on to these bags with all this clapping

>> No.7419792 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1516448931638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7419792

>be American
>sell

>> No.7282165 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1516448931638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7282165

>yuropoos jealous that we play the market better than them

>> No.6876757 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1516448931638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6876757

Thanks for holding my bags Yurop

>> No.6843090 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 578[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6843090

>The west is buying

Apologize please

>> No.6731533 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1516448931638.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6731533

Thanks for holding my bags yurop.

>> No.1644242 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1457939531234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1644242

Move out of your communist shit hole country or be poor forever

>> No.1556122 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 578.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1556122

>>1556102

LOL it's up 10% now, guarrantee to open higher on the Canadian market thus BTFO of OP.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AGSTF/quote

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm gonna buy 5000 more shares just to cuck OP even more

>> No.513758 [View]
File: 475 KB, 587x600, 1401140232824.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
513758

>>513751

>No, I didn't say that at all. What I said is that I discount event risk based on the likelihood of the event. You've posed a hypothetical with an extremely unlikely sequence of dependent events. The correct evaluation of your test case is to discount the risk based on the aggregate improbabilities of the events.

According to that logic everyone would be selling tail risk. But they aren't, they're all buying it. Causing it to be in fact overpriced. Check and mate (again)

>This is pretty much elementary risk management. You are making yourself look foolish now. Your earlier posts, though incorrect, at least showed some intelligence.

And none of yours have.

>>513756

>Samefagging really doesn't help your case.

Calling out samefag on a board with IDs.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]