/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9786684

Maybe your burger brain doesn't understand but even if the whole USA as whole is banned from using crypto, it still won't crash crypto, comprende? Who gives a fuck about you man, the rest of the world is much bigger than USA. USA doesn't mean shit without their nukes and since nukes aren't in crypto well then boo hoo.

>>7901340
>Go do something productive with your lives.
Yes, go make Mr Shekelberg money, while building or selling a meaningless product/service in an overly saturated and competitive market, and have absolutely zero impact on the world, in the greatest possibly time to be alive in human history.

>>7821216

Already accumulated up to 6k LINK sitting tight in my etherwallet. I wanna gamble with the rest of my shitcoin stack.

>>7785550
>>7787022
>>7787059
The more I look into this, I want to ask: how is interledger going to allow legacy systems to utilize smart-contract platforms of their choice, without secure data inputs and payment messages to banks, retailers or cryptos, via an oracle network (which should be decentralized to be more difficult to compromise). What if customers don't want to be limited to using the XRP network for interoperability and off-chain external data inputs?

>>7735170
>>7735412
>You're focusing on just one method of value creation for LINK and you're completely ignoring the actual use of the token by parties in need of the oracle network.
>So $20 from just the secondary aspect of value creation is good with me once you factor in the primary value driver the price should easily hit $50-$100.

This. The buyers/sellers of the token for the potential ROI is just one network effect of many:
corporations buying and using LINK (if it saves them money, they're not going to care if it's $20 or $50, they're buying it for the utility of cost/time savings)
Then there are the nodes that will hold LINK for reputation/collateral.
>>7735535
>>7735615
Basically, people invest in tech companies because of the discounted future cashflows, which are projected to be massive in some cases. In LINK's case, the return will be dictated by the utility of the network/token + the speculation on the token, ultimately. So that's what we're betting on.

>>7699267
>has no value nor will be used ever for anything blockchain or finance related
Seriously, how do you come to that conclusion? I want to understand the thinking process here.

>>7679870
>>1:01:30 - "I'm going to make a meme about this to make it popular..."

Hmmm, I wonder if I actually watch the previous 10 seconds. Oh right:

>Please don't lose your password.
>I'm going to make a meme about this to make it popular...

2/10 bait though

>>7627762
>>7627778
So closed to holy digits. Much better summary than mine
>>7627793
fucking kek, that's causing more fear in linkies than anything else in that post

>>7587961

Yeah, I keep zilch on exchanges because I'm paranoid and it's an easy way to intervene the panic selling that might occur during work because I can't access my wallets from the phone.

I'm considering going 5k on 15x short on monday, have to sell few stocks to get the cash but I'm fairly confident this is the right call.

Are nasdaq or sp 500 worth shortin too?

>>7138972

Lmao it failed with 2$ fee and now I just looked it again and it succeeded with 0.36$ fee. RIP never gonna buy from this shit again. Glad I got my EOS back.

Can't fucking wait for EOS mainnet for FEELESS TRANSACTIONS. You will fucking realize why ETH will die.

>>6728794

Dis is pretty near bro

>>5756573

I'm not even trying to swing trade this. I coulda made more XLM yesterday by selling at around 4k and buy around 3.7k this morning but fuck if it woulda gone other way around I would've lost so much so I'm not taking any chances with this.

HODL until fairx and real world usage, otherwise stay poor.

I don't know this since I got in around 30 cents a pop so idgaf about your salty no XRP holding tears.