/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18835784
This.
You don't need to reduce risk a miniscule amount by diversifying inside an already highly-risky asset class while giving up your upside potential. If there were other credible oracle networks vying for dominance you would, but thankfully Sergey has already crushed his competition so you don't need to!

Put another way: what fucking project has better upside than Chainlink, a literal monopoly on the most valuable segment of all cryptoassets, where all other cryptoassets literally REQUIRE IT TO FUNCTION?

>>16426552
ZRX needed ghetto KYC, so I bought a bunch of shitty burner phones after work from all the electronics stores near me and used my friends’ info to install the Civic app. The BAT ico got frontrun by some whales paying insane gas fees, so missed that one. Tried to get into the new chinese exchange’s ICO for something called TRON, but they were KYCing for Chinese IDs only, no dice. REQ kyc needed a non-US id, so got a friend to do that for me. Raiblocks shills were really annoying, don’t they know that DAGs have a token velocity problem? Bancor looks like a jewish scam, EOS has that Brock Pierce and Dan Larimer pedo running a YEAR LONG ICO? Smells like money laundering. Tezos looked very promising but their husband/wife team were obvious wall st. assholes who were just doing it for the money. Damn, I missed Chainlink by a day, but wow this is the best whitepaper I’ve read all year, and the next day was only trading 2x the ICO price on etherdelta. Since I can’t get into any more deals I’m just gonna sell my ZRX for a clean 5x ICO price and all-in the rest of my eth and ride the LINK hype when people figure out how good a project it is. Holy fuck that chinkshitcoin Antshares rebranded and went to the fucking MOON. WTF raiblocks did it TOO?! Shit was starting to go off the rails. Obvious garbage like Paragon was getting funded, but LINK is only 14x, def not making the same mistake and selling early...

Cont.