/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12048709
>none of these prove bitcoin is unconfiscable assuming you aren't an idiot
Okay. All those people were idiots, but you're smarter than them, got it.

>imagine the IQ
Not an argument. You are disingenuous, because ironically, you've demonstrated that you know exactly what the problem is, you're just not acknowledging it.

>nobody forces you to use segwit
Okay. Good luck going against the grain with that one.

>Bitcoin isn't centralized
Large mining pools operating as a cartel have centralized the major cryptos. If you don't know this, you don't even understand the networks of what you've invested in.

>bug: irrelevant if you are using proper software (see TRB). exploit was impossible to put in practice anyway
>irrelevant fucktards put money in exchange and losing them is a feature
Security doesn't just mean the network. It means the whole thing. And if you want to ignore market forces by writing off the losses of people who are not you, you are ignoring the bigger picture. Not to mention being an asshole, which I mean, is pretty clear you are. Also:
https://rados.io/list-of-documented-exchange-hacks/

>>10680500
NEO may unironically be the worst coin with a mcap over 1 billion. Bullshit Chinese ETH knockoff that gives you GAS that isn't even enough to fill up your car with gas

Anyone who bought shitcoins got exactly what they bought: shit.