/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56913891
MR GENSLER, WE IN THE ETHEREUM COMMUNITY NEED REGULATORY CLARITY!! VIVEK IS COMING FOR YOU!

[Article will be posted separately below]

At the irrelevant Republican debate, the shit-lib moderator brought up a question about crypto using the Jamie Dimon frame of reference that it was all for criminals and so asked how much more should it be regulated.

Maintaining the theme of his platform of dismantling the administrative state, candidate Vivek Ramaswamy basically said the SEC should figure things out quickly or else fuck off entirely. I think he might have also told Nikki Haley to shut up and go make him a sandwich, but I haven't watched it myself so can't confirm.

What does biz think of crypto's relevance to national politics continuing to increase? In the next Presidential cycle after this one, how much will Prez candidates have to pander to crypto bros? Will you do the needful and vote Vivek, or will you support Kennedy even though he would just be grassy knolled if he won? Don't actually discuss the candidates that much though as it would make the thread boring. Will we have to wait for boomers to die off completely before laws become more chill and favorable for crypto? Kennedy and Vivek both clearly care more about courting younger voters in comparison to other candidates, so I think that was part of their calculation. Or is institution-capture closer at hand than that, with countries like El Salvador and Argentina being only a precursor?