/biz/ - Business & Finance

why after 3 years chainlink staking is still not operational?

>>20426583
Yep, your thread is what prompted me to post this. Glad to hear it, fuck those faggots.

>>20350050

>>20292183
>Vertcoin
Damn what a throwback, just went and checked the charts
That shit went from 4c to $8 during the first great bull run

Absolutely fucking insane gains. God damn anon, I hope the second bull run is even half as exciting.

>>20123271
also this being said, i literally couldn't care less if other people buy linkpool. i have never sold mine, and will never sell mine. I can post transactions of LinkPool paying me LINK from over 1 year ago, and i have never sold any LP. and i never will.
I could not care less about the price, i thoroughly want my frens here to understand how crucial it is to get a ticket into a high quality node, so that when staking comes anons dont rope because they cant even stake their link after 3+ years of holding

>>20106867
This is an interesting idea anon, and certainly one that a lot of other people share.

The reason I am bullish on LinkPool is exactly because of your statement here, though.
Are you aware that LP holders receive a cut of every single person who decides to use LinkPool?
Every single time a new person uses LinkPools services, whether it be a LinkPool node, or their Node-As-A-Service offering, or their ETH 2.0 Node service, LP holders receive a cut of the fees.

If LinkPool takes any sizable share of the LINK node marketplace, LP holders will be drowning in fees

Thanks for the support frens, I did see a number of posts on that thread of anons appreciating my work.

>>20028232
>Retards will be retards just don't pay them any mind.
yeah, this is the ultimate truth. i am glad that i at least was able to shed light for some anons who were willing to take a look at the results.

i'm still working on building out my shitty script, and taking some of the ideas in that thread
top requests mainly were "what other coins do LINK whales hold"
thats my current task, building out a more robust and automatic version to track this specifically.

but the tool is great in comparing whales among specific coins, albeit not perfect because of exchange wallets and whales using multiple wallets to obscure their LINK holdings from their shitcoin holdings

>>20010295
>>20010317
thanks for the tip friend. will look more into this, though admittedly im a bitch about using JS

reached out to my front-end friend about collabing on this idea, something like whalecompare.com or some shit
can input the threshold, and any number of ERC tokens to see if there are wallets that hold that amount of both tokens

this can obviously be avoided by whales using multiple wallets, but its an interesting idea that could hold some utility

>>19987220
If at any point in the next 5 years coinbase introduces mAssets into their platform for users, with DMM as the backbone, you will be irrefutably incorrect.

Until then, it is 100% speculation. But based on the fact that the lead dev used the present tense "working with" and not "worked with", it is fair to assume that they are still working with coinbase devs.
Considering DMM is already available in coinbase wallet, there would be no reason to continue this working relationship if that was the extent of the integration.

Only time will tell, fren.

>>19972954
I can not fucking wait for staking to be released and all you retards realize you will never be able to participate in it.

Nobody is going to use NEET nodes, and no respectable node operator is going to allow others in their node, why would they? So they make less money?
Going to be absolutely fucking hilarious when everyone here is fighting over scraps and anons are posting success stories about getting 100 LINK into an actual reputable node, and those successes will be few and far between.

>>19931456
It makes sense anon.

First of all, we're on a shitty anonymous image board that most people never go to, implying that we've all been using computers for a while.

Second, and most importantly, we're on a specific board on 4chan that is dedicated to understanding emerging technology that is yet to be realized by the rest of the world.
Understanding blockchain, smart contracts, decentralized finance, decentralized oracles, etc.. requires at least a reasonable understanding of technology. It's not surprising to me that the majority of /biz/ has careers in tech

>>19874455
>import json
>json.loads(API)

>>19863965
>what #2 coin (besides BTC, ETH, XMR) does biz hold in high esteem as LINK?
As of right now, quite literally nothing.
Anyone who says anything different is trolling, shilling their favorite shitcoin, or a newfag.

You could have made a case a few years ago for NEO or OMG being as highly regarded as LINK, but their times are long past.
Flavor of the month is picking your favorite DeFi coin, so probably one of those at the moment.
Think: Aave, SNX, BNT, KNC, COMP, etc

But as i said, those are flavor of the month and nothing comes even remotely close to LINK and the big 2

>>19658171
I am not only holding LINK.

Not going to bother saying what other coins I hold, because they're long shots at best and quite literally 85% of my portfolio is LINK , about 10% is ETH and the last 5% is the aforementioned coins.
I do unironically think $1000 is possible, but not EOY 2020 or even 2021. If smart contracts take off and start to make every single industry who utilizes them more money, it will spread like wildfire. And LINK will be the unseen/unknown goliath at the center of it all.
This is of course only possible if/when staking is finally released and nodes must start stacking collateral for high value contracts.

>>19658207
cheers, friend. Honestly thought Bancor was kill after 2017, but they've done a surprisingly decent job of staying relevant. Hoping they do well because all the jew memes were hilarious

>>17608478
this is something i struggled with ever since LinkPool ICO

i settled on buying 0.04 (the minimum amount you can buy) because i was told that LP owners will get early access to staking in LP nodes when staking goes live
maybe im an idiot and more LINK would be better but at this point 0.04 LP is like $300, which is absolute pennies compared to my LINK stack

>>15448006
it is a JSON parser
pic related

A literal JSON parser, delusional fucking linkies. see you faggots back at $1