/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50652780
>>50652791
>STILL no signature

Satoshi is dead or Satoshi/Bitcoin is a government project.

If Satoshi was an individual, he's NOT ALIVE. Anyone claiming Satoshi is a living individual is absolutely a paid shill of some sort. But there also exists paid shills who say "Satoshi is [INSERT NAME] who is dead". Such shills exists as well. Likewise, their purpose is ALSO to muddy the truth and to divert attention away from whoever/whatever Satoshi was. So just because an individual is dead and looks like he could've had the skills to create Bitcoin, that doesn't mean he was Satoshi. And again, Satoshi might never even have been an individual in the first place as already pointed out.

Why must Satoshi be dead or be the government?

Because the massive faggot Craig Wright wouldn't be able to strut around claiming to be Satoshi * without any worry that Satoshi would suddenly move his coins. Which would completely destroy Craig instantly. So Satoshi is dead, and Craig knows that. Or, alternatively, he knows Bitcoin was some sort of government creation.

Furthermore, and this is important: Craig GLOWS. He has NSA and DHS and other glowy connections.

And Craig's grandfather (very few anons know about this):
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=yes&search_text=craig+nsa+grandfather
>>/biz/thread/S19822847#p19826813
>his grandfather is responsible for furthering communism and white genocide

And don't misunderstand; this isn't a convoluted anti-Bitcoin post. I'm not saying you should sell your coins. Just because it may have started out as a government creation doesn't make it bad. The Internet itself was a government/military creation, and look what happened to it. Nor is this post anti-BSV or anti-BCH. BTC was indeed technologically crippled. Yet fact remains Craig glows brightly as hell, and his "vision" of crypto, what he wants to achieve, glows as well.

----

* (if he was, he wouldn't have needed to fake blog posts, and other stuff, to make it look like he was working on Bitcoin).