/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57722885
>I would be compelled to listen to your midwittery.

lol you're the one that insists on coming here. Maybe take the hint that nobody is buying your delusional horseshit and fuck off back to your luxury yacht while we all continue having fun staying poor.

>>55283359
>making big Bitcoin profits

And where exactly are these supposed profits going to come from?

>>53144495
>Lmao monerofag is seething when forced to acknowledge his coin is in fact possibly worthless as a store of value, denying the possibility to function as money
>Supply bugs are to be expected, that's why you need certainty, not like in monero

Notice how the seething maxipad continues to act like his surveillance shitcoin is somehow magically immune from being destroyed by a destructive chain rollback.


>>Supply bugs are to be expected

No they're not, dipshit. The odds of an inflationary event actually killing an established and widely-eyeballed cryptocurrency are TINY.
>>that's why you need certainty, not like in monero

There is NO certainty when it comes to software implementations, moron. The cryptography underlying Bitcoin's transaction signing scheme might also theoretically be broken, you'll NEVER have 100% certainty it isn't but yet you'll continue to use Bitcoin without worry because its still VERY unlikely.
>>Fungibility is useless for money if you have an undetected supply bug

The right here is the quote of the thread, we've hit peak maxitard.

No fungibility = no censorship resistance = no future.
>Notice how he tries to manipulate you saying coinbase transactions are transparent which is true but it's not transaction amounts which is where the bug can happen

Transactions amounts are kept in check by zero-knowledge range proofs (Bulletproofs+), which mathematically validate that inputs and outputs sum to zero. These range proofs are open sauce and have been subjected to multiple rounds of 3rd party auditing. There could THEORETICALLY be a bug in there that everybody has missed but then again there could THEORETICALLY be a bug in Bitcoin's transaction signing scheme as well.
>Yes an undetected supply bug can totally destroy monero since it can't be detected and fixed as fast as it should

lol as opposed to Bitcoin? Do enlighten us, how exactly would you fix an exploited inflation bug in Bitcoin *without* rolling back the chain?

>>49255895
>The fact that ciphertrace wont give away trade secrets to a literal who youtuber faggot?

lol they don't gave to give away ANY secrets, just need to demonstrate they can do what they claim they can do.

But they have consistently failed to do deliver the goods so nobody takes them seriously.