/biz/ - Business & Finance

*doesn't follow the market at all*

>>28543289
>>28543418

>>28430526
>>28430422
I am always down to meme RLC and have plenty of memes. I will make multiple threads a day on top of participating in the general thread.

>>27574972
Because the team is cooking up big things, and combined with the RLC/eRLC tokenomics and potential listings/adoption it's one of the only coins that can go 1000x and stay 1000x.

>>27338642
Are you sure gilles? The binance bots control this coin and there's nothing you can do, even if you use all 150 MILLION DOLLARS the team has to pump it

The binance bots always win
>>27338714
That's DIGITAL POO to you nigger

>>26560577
7s of truth

>>26287741
>>26287821
>>26287866
>>26287876
>>26287954
Copied from another thread

LETS DO SOME MATH, SHALL WE RETARDS?

Current price: 1.39
Marketcap: 111,032,823

LINK price @ 111,032,823 = around 30 cents

IT'S LIKE BUYING LINK AT 30 CENTS OR LESS
RLC is actually bigger than LINK imo, eventually too. FUCK NOILERS!

Oh, AND I FOROGT NIGGERS!

If (when) RLC reaches LINK's current MC, 1 RLC will be OVER $100.

IMAGINE thinking RLC isn't a big deal and not having at least 870 barrels KEK!

we are ALL MAKING IT THIS YEAR

>>25935449
>HE THIKNS MUH FACTORY OF SCALE CAN OUTPRICE A DECENTRALIZED FACTORIES OF SCALE LOCATED ON A DIGITAL MARKETPLACE
KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEEKEKKEEKEKEKKEKEKEKEKEEKKEKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

>RLC
>Approved by French SEC
>Working with SEC to get approval
>LGBT friendly
>low supply
>silently works away and only markets when they have news
>tranny orgy party invites
>Digital Oil

>CRIPPLE
>shitcoin
>sued by SEC
>spending millions to get on exchanges
>spend more time working on advertising twitter bots than their project
>high supply
>Going to 0

The choice was always clear

NSMDO

>>24399499
RLC

Based....on a true story of world domination.

>>24163758
but shaking things up and rejecting agreement with the AMF, aka all of EU basically, would just but shit for the market on both sides
there's no way they don't approve it and add more instability in these current times
SEC approval is in the bag

>>23704460
>n-no n-need to name t-them and p-please forget that I tried shilling a shitcoin but got BTFO so bad I gave up that tactic almost immediately
>plebbit style 'get help' statement
just rope already nigger before it gets done for you

>>23442077

INSIDERS ARE BUYING

>>21060334
It's simple, you put your token and the exact equivalent in ETH (or sometimes stablecoins) in a smart-contract.
The funds are used as liquidity and loans, the fees/interests paid by the traders/borrowers are given back to you.

It's not much different than putting your money in a saving account of a bank (where they already use your deposits, at leverage 50, to do all that shit).
This is good because you can offset a dump in price with fees, the catch however is that if the tokens/ETH you put rise a lot in value then you make less money than simply holding, so it's a good deal in a crabbing market, not so much in a strong bullrun.

I only tried with pocket change though, we already saw people getting violently rekt by flashloans and there is always a chance of smart contracts being bugged/exploited.
My guess is that people putting a lot of money on these platforms are either a bit too greedy or already worth few millions.
In few years however it will probably be much safer (but the returns much less too).

Illuminati checking in

What happens when Helios inevitably emerges from the iExec marketplace in 2052?