/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50056227
You made a reasoned take demonstrating objective fact, which is absolutely valid context without even taking into account macro factors. You then start rationalising away and pretending it isn't and calling people who say it's a good point retarded kek. All because LINK couldn't POSSIBLY hit $3. Picrel is you. That is cognitive dissonance, anon. You are emotionally coping with an inconvenient perspective you yourself mentioned.