[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.14490710 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, 1526316605749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14490710

oh its a 2017 article
kek

>> No.14387287 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14387287

>>14386882
LMAO THIS JUST LUTERALLY PROVES SWIFT WENT WITH CORDA INSTEAD OF HYPERLEDGER

>> No.10741739 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, 1518397007353.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10741739

>>10741716

>> No.10634206 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634206

>>10633063
more like 4-5

>> No.10483994 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10483994

>>10483961
Deluded stinkies are absolutely convinced that LINK tokens will be the only tokens available to run a node on the network. But it's obviously not going to be the case when reality kicks in. SWIFT will have their own token.

>> No.9425731 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9425731

>>9424853
Found the newfag. People have known about CORDA for months and months ever since I posted pic related.
>>9424928
Also probably this.

>> No.7571116 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7571116

>>7571018
>hyperledger is one of the biggest cards up LINKs sleeve
What do you make of the pros and cons of Hyperledger according to Swift? Scroll down on pic related.

>> No.7502953 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7502953

>>7502872
Too bad Swift sees more cons than pros in using Hyperledger.

>> No.7451529 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7451529

>>7451450
Too bad Hyperledger has more cons than pros according to Swift, who are still 4-5 years away from actually implementing DLT.

>> No.7322405 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7322405

Friendly reminder SWIFT won't even be using Chainlink even when it does finally start using distributed ledger technology (which is in at least 4-5 more years by the way).

Here's what it says on smartcontract.com:

"We're proud to be working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle."
Get it? Their OWN SWIFT Smart Oracle. That is NOT the chainlink network oracle

Never forget that banks are interested in the blockchain technology, NOT some fucking ERC20 shittoken made by some journeyman who walked away from NXT. All you autists who are constantly harping on about "the SWIFT announcement" are absolutely deluded. It's like you just conveniently ignore what it actually says on smartcontract.com itself simply because it doesn't make you feel good.

>> No.6721277 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6721277

D E L U D E D
E
L
U
S T I N K Y
I
O
N
A
L I N K I E S

>> No.6721164 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6721164

Friendly reminder SWIFT doesn't even plan on using distributed ledger technology for another 4-5 years.

>> No.6614405 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6614405

Friendly reminder SWIFT don't even plan on using distributed ledger technology for another 4-5 years.

>> No.5803056 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, 1514945841120.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5803056

Another kind anon shared this article about SWIFT and blockchain last night but it didn't get noticed. It was behind a payall so it flew under the radar but Linkies will love it. It also brings up Singapore.

Thoughts? What does this mean for the future of Chainlink? Chainlink isn't hugely drastic to implement right? The do bring up the nostro reconciliation poc but that seems like a much bigger overhaul of their systems than Sergey's poc.

>> No.5786665 [View]
File: 1.58 MB, 916x5196, SWIFT DLT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5786665

This one kinda flew under the radar recently (perhaps because it's only available to subscribers), but what, if any, bearing does this news have on Chainlink's work with SWIFT? To me it seems like SWIFT are still some way off on deciding to fully implementing blockchain technology.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]