/biz/ - Business & Finance

I sure am thankful these good Samaritans were amongst the first people to post in this thread to remind me of my investment. However, it sure would be interesting (and very funny) if BBBY had an injunction filed against trading of its stock in order to preserve its NOL by way of preventing changes in ownership. I would also find it quite humorous if there was a clause in the confirmation plan that explicitly stated, "in the event of fraud", the plan can be revoked and changed at any point. Considering the above, many laughs would be had if there was a lawsuit filed against the board of BBBY for fraud, thus activating the aforementioned clause. And, hypothetically, if all executives apart from Ryan Cohen's appointees were named in that lawsuit, it would seem to follow that he is benevolent to the company, and in fact didn't alienate his most loyal stockholders for a barely 1% increase in his net worth, getting involved in a Section 16B lawsuit in the process.

What's that? Oh? All the funny little things I just mentioned in this post are real? And there is even an 11.8 billion dollar claim filed against BBBY, an amount that perfectly matches the amount in share buybacks done by the board (who is being sued)?

Whew, that sure is a lot of funny coincidences that are following my bankrupt towel store. I sure hope these coincidences do not cause anyone to lose a potentially infinite amount of money. Well, that would only happen if certain groups of nefarious neerdowells continued to short the company despite not having the shares to do so, and of course, no one would be THAT stupid.

notice how this thread has lasted from 39 minutes into market open until 3.75 hours post market. When the next batch of "organic volatility" in price emerges, the next batch of "organic volatility" in comment rate will appear all over social media and here. Begin to note the paid stock bashers and hype fatiguers who work the discussion spaces.

Please take note that RC tried to buy bbby in december 2022 for 400 million. Please take note that pitchbook listed the company as sold in january 2023. Please take note that the former board members of bbby (including sue gove) are now (as of today june 21 2024) are being represented by a law firm SPECIALIZING IN M&A.

Please take note that superfluous commenting will continue to take place in these threads to drown out legitimate discussion of RC's activities.

https://www.youtube.com/live/ON8I5Fgvw2Q

1 hour and 13 minutes 45 seconds when biggy begins his main talk.

why would biggy be "scared" to tell what he knows? Could he be accused of market manipulation? could he be fearful for hedge funds doxxing him like they did to ppseeds? biggy also said this would "probably" be the last time he comes onto the show.

My cynical instinct is to assume its just to generate hype and be dramatic. But assuming there was an actual reason what would it be? This going silent stuff, and the "idk if I should share what Ive researched and found" just seems like beating the hype drums, which even if they are acting in good faith just seems manipulative and in poor taste, UNLESS there is some legal reason or otherwise strong case as to why being ambiguous would be a good idea if your a quality DD producer.

Expect delays, and also expect entrenched, former bullish and revered dd writers to be activated overtime. There are many topics that aren’t debilitating for hedgies but are still of interest to non finance folk - for assets to gain trust with over months/years then slowly morph into something that makes the community look insane or retarded or just plain trying ti demoralize people or cause infighting.

I sure am thankful these good Samaritans were amongst the first people to post in this thread to remind me of my investment. However, it sure would be interesting (and very funny) if BBBY had an injunction filed against trading of its stock in order to preserve its NOL by way of preventing changes in ownership. I would also find it quite humorous if there was a clause in the confirmation plan that explicitly stated, "in the event of fraud", the plan can be revoked and changed at any point. Considering the above, many laughs would be had if there was a lawsuit filed against the board of BBBY for fraud, thus activating the aforementioned clause. And, hypothetically, if all executives apart from Ryan Cohen's appointees were named in that lawsuit, it would seem to follow that he is benevolent to the company, and in fact didn't alienate his most loyal stockholders for a barely 1% increase in his net worth, getting involved in a Section 16B lawsuit in the process.

What's that? Oh? All the funny little things I just mentioned in this post are real? And there is even an 11.8 billion dollar claim filed against BBBY, an amount that perfectly matches the amount in share buybacks done by the board (who is being sued)?

Whew, that sure is a lot of funny coincidences that are following my bankrupt towel store. I sure hope these coincidences do not cause anyone to lose a potentially infinite amount of money. Well, that would only happen if certain groups of nefarious neerdowells continued to short the company despite not having the shares to do so, and of course, no one would be THAT stupid.