[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.58280139 [View]
File: 737 KB, 950x850, patchouli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58280139

>>58280111
Go to Thailand and have sex. You will become an unstoppable superhuman.
You'll exude an aura of confidence. Girls will smile at you everywhere you go.

>> No.53373037 [View]
File: 737 KB, 950x850, thats not how legal works.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53373037

These jeets even tried to claim a change in license from GPL to MIT is bullish.

>>52655141
>David Gelertner is an active professor at Yale university, so it is curious on why he would choose the license belonging to another school. This seems to confirm that there is a partnership between MIT and Yale to develop the project alongside big banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH
A FUCKING LICENSE CHANGE THATS MORE RESTRICTIVE IS BULLISH AND PROOF OF ANYTHING?

https://archived.moe/biz/thread/52655141/#52655743
>The switch to MIT license is probably the biggest happening in the last 3 years of crypto. This basically allows researchers from MIT to perform blockchain data analysis on quantum computers to find any bugs or exploits and use Machine Learning to write more sophisticated code, which allows for bigger block sizes (1mb to 30gb, using .zip compression algorithm). MIT grants also allow the devs to pay for blockchain development and security. This is a huge step up.
You don't need to switch from GPL to MIT to perform analysis on the code. Quantum computers have no relevance to the sentence it's thrown in as a bullish buzzword for no reason, you don't need to change the license to look for exploits, you don't need to change the license to use machine learning to change the code (machine learning / ai code sucks ass at the moment by the way, it's not inventive at all and mostly relies on existing code), has nothing to do with bigger block sizes, and .zip compression algorithm isn't specific at all, not possible at all you can make 30gb blocks of real data appear as 1mb, and MIT grants have nothing to do with whether your stupid devs will get paid "for development and security" and no, changing the license does not mean your scam will get any grant at all. It's complete nothingburger and clearly the change from GPL to MIT is more proof that this chain is in fact NOT for the people.

>> No.49904281 [View]
File: 737 KB, 950x850, you what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49904281

>>49904269
Benchooooood filter the thread!

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]