/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16421728
>Satsgang unloading their bags finally?
I have seen them in the Telegram since last summer. They believe in the fundamentals. Headroom will give 1M DAG to his children. They are actually the opposite of moonboys and focus heavily on tech when they tweet and make comments on Twitter. And I am no fan of them. However, they did a good job on Twitter and you are spewing utter nonsense. Either you have no clue or you are lying through your teeth.

It's a pretty safe bet to say that DAG will be on Binance soon.

>>16231272
DAG will go on larger exchanges once they have finished rolling out mainnet. Operation going on right now.

>Says we aren't ready for world-shattering TPS
VISA is calibrated for 60 000 TPS due to peaks like emergency catastrophe, holidays like Christmas etc. What is Nano's real TPS now? 300 according to last spam test. Crashed every time near 500 blocks per second and network was totally saturated. No way in hell can Nano have the tech to be a global micro-payment system. Even if you did, let's say you managed to have the minimum TPS for a global micro-payments system, 100 000 TPS, what would the enormous costs for bandwith, CPU and IO be? Have you crazy Nano fanatics or your scammer devs ever done the cost analysis? Remember that your whole crazy and dysfunctional business model is that all that costs and work must be done by volunteers fro free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Nano is a dead project with sociopathic and borderline criminal devs and a crazy cult-like fanbase. Worst in crypto. Sorry.

>>16217068
>You seem pretty close to the Constellation team.
I am just an ordinary investor, but have followed the project for over a year now.

>>16191868
Your comment has zero substance.

>>16165764
>Is it even back to ico price yet? Kek
No, and that's a good thing from an investor perspective. We can still buy DAG insanely cheap.