[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.57721023 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, grid_computing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57721023

>>57721006
True, I'm up 18.25x on my best buy and x2.027 on my worst one

>> No.57668728 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, grid_computing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57668728

>>57668570
Because people love to get left behind and buy at high prices so that they can then sell at low prices and whine about how WE fucked them up and mislead them...

They won't buy at 3.8$, but they sure as hell will buy at 20$+ when the whole board is already on board and has their trigger fingers ready on the sell button.

>> No.29339540 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, grid_computing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29339540

>>29339291
Read through the POCO series

https://medium.com/iex-ec/about-trust-and-agents-incentives-4651c138974c

It's a high level overview of the POCO consensus algorithm they use, which is the core to iexec. Just read the full series, it'll help you understand it in more non-technical terms

>> No.23252422 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, rlc_grid_computing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23252422

>>23252287
hey there, I know you. You always post and say the same number.

>>23252342
This guy above you is probably for real, since he's been in RLC threads for at least 6 months

>> No.22282147 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, 1599120149926.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22282147

>>22281505
NSMDO

>> No.22228444 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, 1599120149926.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22228444

>>22228356
I get similar vibes when looking at RLC vs LINK all the time. Nobody seems to understand that it is much bigger than "decentralized cloud computing". It is actually a missing step for to widespread enterprise smart contract adoption. Most enterprises will want more complex stuff to happen on the blockchain with data they don't want exposed. The data also will not be efficient to calculate on the blockchain due to high cost. Therefore, they will do off chain computing on RLC.

>> No.22157062 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, grid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22157062

>>22156482
cause it's just the market
volume is abysmal
this thing is a ton of dynamite with a 2 inch fuse, it just needs one blog post from jewgle or jewtel or GAYMD and it will explode to $10

>> No.21823111 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, rlc_grid_computing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21823111

>>21823013
Yes, iExec Academy and the 2nd part of the V5 update (fog/edge computing, super important shit), after that we get a new roadmap or some time before the V5 update (can't wait for this). And we're probably getting (I'm guessing this, not really a 100% on this) a partnership announcement or 2 in until the end of the year

>> No.21518951 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, grid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21518951

Definitely iExec. 6 PhDs and 19 years of pajeetery. Only dogshit no name Indian/bangladeshi partners like "IBM" and Microsoft(one of the largest employers in India)
Absolute currycoin if I ever saw one, anons here shill it because every version comes out with some new java upgrade with "muh real life utility" and "decentralised masalaplace"
Avoid like the plague

>> No.21328645 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, grid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21328645

tfw only 78,500 barrels

>> No.21290418 [View]
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, grid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21290418

September enterprise edition soon

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]