[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.16841880 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16841880

>>16841822
>do you even know the meaning of the words?
I do and so does the SEC, which is why VIDT will never be on any other exchanges (as confirmed in the AMA)

>> No.16767080 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16767080

>>16766941
Yes. Do the opposite of what I'm suggesting. You don't want to be a faggot.

>>16766981
VIDT is a security token. We've went over this way before IDEX banned US users from trading it, newfag.

>> No.16267640 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16267640

>>16267626
I know. That video is clear evidence they're implying the price will go up because of the buy and burn.

>> No.16194679 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16194679

>>16194569
You mean,
You cannot validate real-world items on the blockchain. No artworks, no photographs, and no photographs of real world items. You can only validate binary and lossless documents, such as PDFs, Powerpoint projects, executables, and audio files. The Rembrandt etching on the blockchain was a marketing ploy to boost the credibility of the project. Good one at that. Fooled me as well. In the end you would still need a third-party examiner painstakingly verifying every single inch of the artwork and play "spot the difference" between a real Rembrandt and a fraudulent one to see whether you have pulled a switcheroo, rendering V-ID's validation process pointless. The artwork is going to be validated by an art examiner, not a blockchain solution. V-ID is as useful as a certificate of authenticity. Both can be forged enough to fool a notary.

V-ID is a tech company with no unique tech or first mover advantage. Supposedly uses algorithms that cannot be patented, according to bagholders. Multiple competition exists, including Acronis Notary, IBM Blockchain Trusted Identity, and Bitcoin.com Notary to name a few. V-ID's potential advantage is a user-friendly design, which can be had for $10,000. V-ID is in the software industry, so let's value the business at an incredibly generous and delusionally optimistic 3X revenue. In which case the company can be estimated to be worth $1,800,000 as of today.

If VIDT will convert to VIDS, which represent shares in the company and the total supply is 62,391,039 VIDT, then one VIDT is realistically worth 2 cents today. 5 cents if we only use the circulating supply (30,800,318). Of course that's with the 3X multiple. At 2X annual revenue (and only looking at circulating supply), one VIDT is worth one penny. And currently, it's even worth less.

>> No.15906065 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15906065

>> No.15892553 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15892553

You cannot validate real-world items on the blockchain. No artworks, no photographs, and no photographs of real world items. You can only validate binary and lossless documents, such as PDFs, Powerpoint projects, executables, and audio files. The Rembrandt etching on the blockchain was a marketing ploy to boost the credibility of the project. Good one at that. Fooled me as well. In the end you would still need a third-party examiner painstakingly verifying every single inch of the artwork and play "spot the difference" between a real Rembrandt and a fraudulent one to see whether you have pulled a switcheroo, rendering V-ID's validation process pointless. The artwork is going to be validated by an art examiner, not a blockchain solution. V-ID is as useful as a certificate of authenticity. Both can be forged enough to fool a notary.

You can validate a scanned document and save it as a PDF and then validate against that same exact scanned PDF, but you could not validate against the original document. Medical and government documents are often printed out, scribbled on, then scanned back in. But even if nothing was scribbled on, a duplicate scan would not match. You would need to verify with eyes.

Competition includes:
https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/solutions/identity/networks
https://deepvaultonline.com/
https://notary.bitcoin.com/
https://notary.acronis.com/
https://stampery.com/
https://stampd.io/

Dubious marketing strategy encouraging mass spamming and washtrading. Scam tokenomics. Useless worthless token. No unique tech. Operating at a loss. Partnered with LTO. Small side project of another company. Pass!

>> No.15887834 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15887834

The only reasons bagholders are holding onto their tokens is because they're unable to sell it. They accumulated too much up to this point without doing their research and there aren't enough buyers. They were hoping the five days of announcements will have them double or triple their money. Now they're balls deep with no way out. Sad tale when someone cannot admit to being wrong and instead double-down by buying more and more.

>> No.15882337 [View]
File: 256 KB, 1298x891, against-the-law-oh-no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15882337

Bad V-ID. Bad!

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]