/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49954839
(centralized crypto lending platforms proven to be unstable and are crashing left and right)
"I don't know guys, it seems like both sides are shilling against each other"
>On the one hand, people are trying to withdraw their own tokens in accordance with the terms of their agreement
>On the other hand, insolvent lending platforms refuse to let people withdraw their money
"Seems like they're both to blame."

seriously, is someone paying you? or are you so bought into propaganda that you honestly believe that there's two sides to this?

>>49901861
so do i

>>49901777
OP i disagree
i mean you could be correct that it's not the bottom
but i disagree with this assertion that a correction/dip/crash/downturn/whatever is only at "the bottom" when complete demoralization and utter despair are present

there have been plenty of times that prices fall by some large or small margin, then begin to rise again, sometimes to all-time-highs
there's no "rule" that prices won't rise again until [insert bottom signal criteria here] occurs

stating that "if someone bullish says it's the bottom, it's not the bottom" doesn't make any sense at all.
literally at some point it will actually be the bottom, and undoubtedly someone will say "this is the bottom" at that point

>>49894731
>LPs have given Bancor 100 LINK
>Bancor only has 40 LINK
>LPs are trying to withdraw 80 LINK
40 LINK isn't that many
All of this hubbub over $260 worth of LINK? Shoot I could just bail them out for $260

>>49748381
Call your mother.
Were you exclusively breastfed or did she give you formula?

>>49745685
>What do you think they invest in?
minding their own business, probably
unlike whatever the fuck this cancer thread is supposed to be

doesn't the outrage over interracial relationships directly conflict with your stance on individual autonomy?

>>49674030
Presumably you're referring to some in vitro test from 20 to 30 years ago.
Thankfully, in vitro genetic screening has improved considerably over the last 30 years, and this kind of false positive just doesn't occur anymore.

>Imagine, letting women have their own agency with deciding if their child lives
abortion was and still is legal, dummy. She did then (and would still today) have agency over this decision

That story is no longer relevant because in vitro genetic screening is more accurate now.
But yeah, let's use anecdotes that "happened" based on nascent science 25 years ago to fit the narrative of our agenda today.

>>49510020
>woman flirts with me
>immediately drop the ball
>post meme on 4chan to complain "girls make fun of me" to feel better

>>49488065
that's not nice