/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18160263
pretty much this is my guess. That’s worst case though, probably we won’t get quite to dark age levels, but I think there will be a very large-scale and potentially quite bloody chimpout occurring before too long
> mfw I didn’t stock up on ammo and got laid off 2 weeks ago

>>18160116
Ok guy, sounds good. I’m sure you aren’t just on a much higher dose of meth than me.
I’ll humor you though, tell me your theories.
>inb4 vague platitudes and predictions ending with “I CAN’T TELL YOU CUZ YOU DON’T EVEN KNOOOOW”

>>16773333

>>16548853
>>16561727
Thank fucking god, these faggot idiots

>>16553689
>>16553763
>>16554616
>>16555654

were starting to legitimately scare me. Ledger especially is so fucking inept when it comes to the experience of using their hardware wallets, I wouldn't be surprised if they overlooked some elementary detail that allows anyone who knows a little cryptography to sidechannel attack the chip inside or some shit

>>15585377
It's not a bitgrail scenario, it was something server-side ("validation error" or something that the API users were having.)

They said in the discord they did identify the issue (almost 2 hours ago) and are "working to fix it now" or whatever.

But now if you ask me, well. I think it's even MORE fucking ridiculous that they MANUALLY and willfully shut shit down for EVERYONE, and for longer than any centralized exchange normally would. If idex didn't have such fucking shit volume they'd be getting assraped in the discord rn.

I've been waiting to withdraw some ETH that I need right now, and I actually tried going to etherscan and sending a query on the blockchain directly to the smart contract, but those geniuses at idex hard-coded in a 100,000 block limit that has to elapse (since your last transaction to the exchange) before it lets you withdraw, if you're not able to access the web interface to withdraw normally. NIGGERS

oh by the way, here's their discord:
discord dot gg / dKfW795

>>11786938
Um....Excuse me but what the fuck.

Nolinker here, I don’t actually hold any but I’ve been following it since the ICO with pretty keen interest. I have an EE degree and (before I quit my job) have worked in multiple companies in computer security.

I think this is the right answer. this guy
>>11787062
>>11787220
is correct to be sperging out the way he is

Basically, for you retards that might’ve missed this brilliant post, the implications of this **I THINK** (still piecing it together myself) are that the chainlink node network would allow for a 100% truly trustless, decentralized, economically-incentivized, *public* random number generator. Meaning, the one-time pad that the originally referenced post mentions would not only rise from the prison of being a theoretical cryptographic “holy-grail” academic concept only, to a cheaply, publicly accessible RNG tool. But it could potentially make an easily generated OTP the cryptographic STANDARD for an unbreakable form of cryptography that you could pull off the chainlink network completely on-the-fly.

In other words I think this literally makes genuine, “trustless” symmetric-key cryptography a thing.

Someone elaborate for me because my brain doesn’t work trying to grok the significance of this

Oh sweet

Maybe somebody will finally buy my bags :) seriously though cool beans, 10x incoming

>>10085924
Monaco looks cool but the Free card has no cashback or anything. For 50 MCO the metal Ruby card has 1% cashback, idk might be worth looking into.

The 500 and 50k MCO ones only add LoungeKey airport lounge access (????) and higher ATM withdrawal limits & shit. I'm not even sure what interbank exchange rate limits are. Overall looks cool though I'll keep it in mind

>>10086146
Is this some of the same shit where you have to hold their coin or whatever?

I'm still not seeing any with good enough features to ditch my Chase card with 1% cashback on everything and no fees.

>>9984299
>>9984214
This is why I visit this place

>>9820969
>>9821038
Pretty sure that there’s no possible way to do that because of the difficulty adjustment and how it relates to the different mining algorithm. Bitcoin uses SHA-256 hashing while 0xbtc is mined with SHA-3 the same as ethereum itself is mined.

Even if you could somehow create a mineable Ethereum token that forks the bitcoin blockchain such that it genuinely preserves the entire chain with all coins at all corresponding addresses and private keys, how would you then start mining THAT? The difficulty would be retarded high I assume - but that doesn’t even make sense since each currency uses a completely different cryptographic hashing algorithm.

Aaaaaaaaand there goes 26sat.

Still holding bags from 28sat in like January, but the Mcafee thing shilled me (even if like other anon said, it's bullshit). I realized how low the risk was on this shit and started pouring my entire stack (except for my biggest bags which are nano, fuck that coin)

Lol as I typed this, 27sat just broke too. Cool beans, maybe I should just say screw nano too

>>9011328
YES YOU WILL BABY LETSSSS GOOOOO

>>3989778
>was ignoring OP until this post
>now have to do opposite of this anon
Wtf do?