/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54458303
>>54458311
>IT'S TRUE T. NEUTRAL BYSTANDER HERE IT'S OBVIOUS LINK IS MOONING ANY DAY NOW REEEEEEEE

>>54140485
ha that would be me
I'm so glad other anons have stepped up, you can't handle the truth can you

>>53882334
>not reading
>not bothering
>still responding with condescending passive aggressive insults
>>53882337
then why haven't we heard anything else from them? why are we getting radio silence for almost 3 years? does anyone know what are the latest developments since then? what about the korean banks here?https://cointelegraph.com/news/chainlink-brings-fx-rates-data-from-top-korean-banks-to-defi
everybody seems to have memory holed all of it and now we're supposed to get excited from "watered down" partnerships with lesser entities. what about Digital asset guys? anybody remember the countless breadcrumbs about them and Blythe?

>>53703342
>Imagine not getting it yet. You have once chance to make it. Once we leave $6.66 accumulation point behind we are headed to $66.6
>SWIFT goes live with their testing phase March 20th. Its only about 5 weeks away.
>They claim this time the date is "definitive".
>bottom is probably already in
>just be patient
>CCIP is coming this year I don't think they will delay it again
yeah buddy, this isn't a thinly veiled hype FOMO thread, I'm terribly sorry for the misunderstanding
pic rel is what will end up happening, again, pretty much what always happens with Chainlink's breadcrumbs

>>53699256
>derivatives has always been the final meme usecase
good to know that this piece was marketing fluff
https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seated-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/
let me guess, OpenLaw, DocuSign, IC3, Oracle, Digital Asset were all "meme" usecases, only SWIFT mattered from the start so let's all be good goys and give them the benefit of the doubt for a couple more years

>>53693091
>a few insignificant PoCs and stress tests done in controlled environments with institutions is "adoption"
>SWIFT is entering blockchain space
it's been 7 years since sibos 2016, don't you think the present tense is a bit redundant
you forgot hbar, much institutional adoption sirs
here's your actual adoption bro, and it doesn't look that good

>>53575275
>the failure of link is vastly overblown on here
no it's not, Oracle, Digital Asset, OpenLaw, Google's BigQuery, InterWork Alliance, DocuSign, BSN each of these connections were either dropped or haven't materialized into anything meaningful, and as for the technical aspect what about Mixicles, DECO, Town Crier, Super-Linear Staking, Proof of Reserves and so on
I don't care what anybody says, announcing the launch of CCIP and an "enterprise abstraction layer" and not delivering shit is a failure regardless of the market conditions
the only thing there's left is a second PoC with SWIFT, a grand total of two PoCs in 6 years, and keep in mind that the first PoC had probably nothing to do with the current iteration of the technology since it happened 1 year before the LINK ICO
considering all of the above, the disheartening price action is only the cherry on top

>>53540018
pic rel continued from before
>klaus shilled them 7 years ago, you now what this means anon, right
>"everything is set is stone, trust the plan"
>10 more years anons
>it is done, everything getting shilled by WEF is kingma-
https://www.weforum.org/organizations/ripple

>>53400731
remember the so called Blythe Masters/Digital Asset connection?
how about Oracle's Q4 2020 integration?
Docusign?
turns out, despite all the bread crumbs, the connections, the hints, it was yet another dead end
but surely, SWIFT will turn out different, right?

>>53400707
it doesn't matter, it flopped couple of months ago
so much for muh DA connection

>>52678294
He was frontrunning their latest failure.

A usecase bites the dust.
https://twitter.com/coindesk/status/1597782264091492353