/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20130691
>new socioeconomic order
>can only function at all with (((centralized))) second layers
>not the platform for anything
>no DeFi being built on it
>no liquidity protocols
>no hybrid blockchain integrations with corda/hyperledger
>no token ecosystems
>literally no chance of changing in any way for the better in future, only "development" is a cucked second layer that nobody uses
>new socioeconomic order
Bitcoin is Betamax lmao enjoy your stockholm syndrome

Imagine being a BTC maxi and watching DeFi explode while your coin just sits there being a "Store of Value" lmao

Imagine being a BTC maxi. Even if BTC went back to $20k that's a 2x from here. If it even got to that other coins would 50x in that same period.
DeFi is kicking off, an entire ecosystem is growing around Ethereum.
And yet there are people who are 100% in BTC. What sort of retarded boomer would you have to be...

>>17066666

>>16571944
Posts like this are exactly why we will rise. Too many bears still think it can't/won't which is why it will.

There are approximately 170,000 tonnes of gold on the planet. Each tonne has 32,000 ounces.
That means there are about 6e+9 ounces of gold on the planet.
If you divide that by 21 million, you get 287.
So every Bitcoin is the equivalent, in terms of total supply, of 287 ounces of gold.
287 ounces of gold is currently worth $428,100USD.

>>13588465
>>13588477
Mhmmm :)
>>13588485
Thanks! The log-log is a neat concept. I would like to see more of the projection to the right though, like the bottom graph.

>>10716177
POS stands for PIECE OF SHIT.

>>10672668
Yes of 2013.

>>10449597
Do you want to know how I can tell that you're a pajeet?

>>10305406
More like EOD

>>10152093
What are the lines?

What is the actual BTC development timeline as it stands? Where can you even see it? I just read about Schnorr signatures and am wondering whether BTC actually has any chance of overcoming its scaling problems in the next 5 years.

Once BTC drops to ~$10,600 and bottoms again, confirming a rising wedge, what leverage are you going to use on your long?

>>7516057
Bitcoin

>>7269819
This is literally fake news. Segwit was a soft-fork (not technically a fork because it is backwards compatible), Bcash was a hardfork with replay protection.

>>6238064
Oh, was he an early adopter or something? I thought all the early adopters were against second layers...

>>4971026
Okay OP, I have a question I've been trying to figure out:

Basically, is there only one FIFO queue for one's entire portfolio, across all exchanges, or is a new FIFO queue created on each exchange?

So if I have a bunch of old Bitcoins I bought for dirt cheap on Coinbase, then I take one and start trading it back and forth on Bittrex, does FIFO only trigger once on Coinbase and then now creates a new queue on Bittrex or does it keep necro-ing my old coins on Coinbase even though i am really trading the same Bitcoin back and forth on bittrex and only touched my old stash once?

Thanks.

>>4937516
I can't wait for OP to become so rich and tell us alllllll about it!

>>4848097
LOL, good one.

>>4473720
>>4473729
Look at the dates on the x axis you absolute dinguses

Why isn't there a decentralised Silk Road yet?

>>4369847

>complain about LINK threads by making LINK threads

>complain about gay people by fucking another dude

>complain about obesity by eating McDonalds every day

Who got

>>4333333

?