/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14982781
>i get it now, you're just fudding useless, baseless crap so you can keep accumulating.
>I see your game anon. better buy quick the train will leave in 2-3 weeks.
Same rambling as when I warned about Bitconnect.

>>14281814
Minimum TPS for a global currency with micro-payments is 100 000 TPS. Visa alone is calibrated for 56 000 TPS. [1] Your cost model is for a kitchen table amateur project. For 100 000 TPS give me the total CPU, IO and Bandwith, then the total costs. You have no clue, do you? Has the Nano team ever done a cost analysis at all? If so, where? If not, you are all insane.

Pic, Dev Zack Shapiro days before Bitgrail crashed, after Devs and their friend took Nanos worth tens of millions of dollars out of Bitgrail, due to their incestuous relationship wiht BitGrail, while retail investors were stuck with fake KYC and frozen accounts.

[1] https://www.accenture.com/no-en/success-visa-connected-commerce-car

>>13792354
The lies from the Nano devs and community is systematic. Second only to Bitconnect. Combine that with shady Nano devs and their friends moving tens of millions of dollars out of an exchange that has withdraws frozen for retail investors before imploding. Pic.

>>13222376
Bitgrail victims are screwed. The Devs, especially the Jewish one, pushed hard for Bitgrail and lied through his teeth how safe it was. After the loss was out in the open, the Nano devs did nothing to help the victims. All mentions of it was banned on their subreddit. So glad I ditched that shitcoin when the Nano nodes crashed constantly approx one month before Bitgrail.

>>12593722
Sure, when I was warning against Bitconnect, I secretly thought it was THE best investment ever, and just wanted to lower the price. Right? Again, do you Nano idiots have any idea how scary and death-cult like you look for potential investors? Did you all transform into a suicide cult after you transitioned over from your beloved Bitconnect?

Pic, Zack Shapiro two weeks before bomber "discovered" that 80% of Nano was stolen.

>>10911982
No. Nano will dump to sub 1 USD and stay there, for so slowly to slide towards zero

Nano has only 756 TPS and can not scale to level Nano devs promise. It is physically impossible. Colin admits now that one might have a second layer. But then Ethereum with their vast resources are fare better equipped to undertake such a daunting task. Single Dev Colin has no chance and as always the Dev team are under-informing about these problems. And Nano moonboys are too stupid to understand it. Nano has constant node problems on an insane level. Just the last 30 days. http://archive.is/v2noA

More here in this thread: >>10873614

>>10904930
lol. you can trust us Nano devs.

>>10878570

>>10844321
>10844693
Read >>10844693

Tell Colin he is an idiot. Stupid Nano "investor", You can trust your devs, right?

>>10839392
>Because of the android wallet mistake?
It is more than just a mistake. Cryptography is their core business. If they make shockingly basic and amateur errors in their core expertise it is not a mistake, but a disaster. Selling deadly pills for a pharmacy company, due to a basic error, is not a mistake for the company, but a disaster.

>lol dude, udp is used in almost every online game you are playing, because it's fast and stateless, why should they use tcp?
UDP is definitely not known as a truly reliable protocol. It makes no guarantees for delivery or the order of messages and does not confirm or authenticate the sender.

>Hiring pretty girls is a bad thing?
You forgot the doing nothing part. That is somewhat crucial. With Bitgrail as a background it is borderline obscene. She might be great on YouTube. Why is she not utilized? Is she there for the joy of the dev team and not Nano investors? The people actually paying the bills?

>Which is 99% of the time the fault of the exchange, they are just too lazy to implement nano properly.
Has Nano ever had high volume transactions on nodes without serious issues for, say, a three months period? Without frozen assets, deposit and withdrawal down. Missing transactions. If not, that should tell you something.

>From lawsuit-trolls, yes. Read them, they are baseless.
See pic. There are more. Imagine a top manager in Coca Cola saying something similar causing Coca Cola customers to lose hundreds of millions of dollars. Sometimes their whole life savings. Causing very likely known suicides. Do you believe there would be a lawsuit against Coca Cola?