/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22253841
>thinking trannies are not a staple of /biz/
Check merv.tech you numbskull

>>22249883
Do not forget...
>most coins
It takes just as much demand/volume to pump as there was doubt/volume to dump
>STATERA
It take LESS demand/volume to pump as there was doubt/volume to dump

HOW DO YOU STILL NOT GET IT?

Everything will go down with BTC, and everything will come back up after, BUT SOME PROJECTS (STATERA) CAN COME BACK FASTER AND HIGHER. DYOR and read the fucking whitepaper :)

>>22227654
Get both. Just get more of the whichever is lower in mcap.

>>22217084
Can’t I just hold BTC, ETH, LINK or any other coins and balance my own index fund?
Yes, but can you add in a way to collect dividends (>36% APY) on your coins based solely on their volume/trading? Can you add in a mechanism that causes constant upward pressure in your index fund? Can you capitalize on every arbitrage opportunity for all the above coins to auto-balance and make gains when possible 24/7? Can you do all of the above in a trustless and truly decentralized (largest holder ~6% of supply) manner?


What is the low volume/high volatility problem?
If an asset or contract has low volume then it is susceptible to high volatility. This leads to the premature failure of many promising projects and contracts early in development and is one of the main barriers to a fully decentralized and digital world. A simple quant balancer cannot solve this as in finance 1.0 because if the volatilty is too high then such a balancer is subject to fail also. However the addition of a deflationary mechanism creates inherent feedback ensuring that it cannot fail unless the entire digital market (ETH, BTC, LINK) collapses. It allows new projects and new contracts to solve the initial growing pains of high volatility and manipulation.
But what if bad actors simply manipulate STA?
This is why the fully decentralized aspect is important.

>>22195955
It has already stabilized and started to rebound faster than literally everything else :)

>>22189397
Can’t I just hold BTC, ETH, LINK or any other coins and balance my own index fund?
Yes, but can you add in a way to collect dividends (>36% APY) on your coins based solely on their volume/trading? Can you add in a mechanism that causes constant upward pressure in your index fund? Can you capitalize on every arbitrage opportunity for all the above coins to auto-balance and make gains when possible 24/7? Can you do all of the above in a trustless and truly decentralized (largest holder ~6% of supply) manner?


What is the low volume/high volatility problem?
If an asset or contract has low volume then it is susceptible to high volatility. This leads to the premature failure of many promising projects and contracts early in development and is one of the main barriers to a fully decentralized and digital world. A simple quant balancer cannot solve this as in finance 1.0 because if the volatilty is too high then such a balancer is subject to fail also. However the addition of a deflationary mechanism creates inherent feedback ensuring that it cannot fail unless the entire digital market (ETH, BTC, LINK) collapses. It allows new projects and new contracts to solve the initial growing pains of high volatility and manipulation.
But what if bad actors simply manipulate STA?
This is why the fully decentralized aspect is important.

>>22152401
It is called "4 month old project with 3 pumps and a need to zoom out.jpg"

>>22142467
>>22142592
fucking based

STA, LINK based as fuck.