/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24971135
>like what?
i just told you in the same post
>doesn't actually prove it.
yes it does.
>doesn't actually prove it you had it first and not them.
nigger you embed your name with the information, if he then can't prove he had the information earlier than that block he loses.

>>24971212
nothing wrong with keeping keys on your computer since they were inside an encrypted file container, however it is a lot wrong with not having a single backup of that container holding the key(s) to thousands of BTC

>>9144604
i know all that's bad with LN, it'll never work.

i guess i just dont know what the heck makes one peer-to-peer network peer-to-peer while another is not. one one network the transaction is broadcasted through peers, it's peer-to-peer. on the other the transaction passes through peers, it's not peer-to-peer. \(o_O)/

Curious that Link is hitting 1700 SATs after all the fudders for the past 2 days were so adamant about selling sub 15k themselves and encouraging others to do so. Almost as if it was to accumulate cheap coin. Crazy huh???

What's the fucking point???

>>3503591
>Thoughts on this?

the communication is outstanding.
they don't leave you alone after the ICO, they keep you up to date with everything they do.
they tell you when you will get your tokens, how much it is, where you receive the tokens and everything is crystal clear.
they fucking email you!
with 0.35 ETH in blackmoon i am a low performer.
but i am also in with 0.5 ETH in chainlink and heard nothing, there is literally NO COMMUNICATION AT ALL.
BMC is exemplary for how to do it right.

my 0.000002 satoshi