/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>2853626
>yes
read greg's post again. obviously the code is not perfect and work could be done... but there are diminishing returns to optimizing user facing shit. that work takes a back seat to advancing the protocol. nitpicking about trivial qt-client inefficiencies seems strange considering the accomplishments like libsecp256k1 and the future upgrades to the blockchain we have planned. unbroken consensus code is needed more than C++ "gurus" rubbing their dicks to code that is slightly more optimized w/r/t the hardware. this is not HFT. it is a user-facing desktop app. how many coins like zcash and ETH have had consensus or scripting vulnerabilities? we don't see that in bitcoin because the consensus-critical code is great.