[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.59097797 [View]
File: 71 KB, 1024x576, whooo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
59097797

>>59097599
(And 3 LINK to whoever dishes the context of picrel)

>> No.57843273 [View]
File: 71 KB, 1024x576, whooo cares.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57843273

>>57843112
>everyone is Thomas
Kind of ironic you claim I'm projecting something when the previous sentences are the projection of your own sum fears about the situation that keeps you holding on just in case, which is in itself emotional decision which you earlier warned others here >>57842906 against making.
None of this nonsense means anything anymore, anon. Not when LINK stays coy at $20.

You're qanon-brained and I'm deprogrammed.

>> No.56607029 [View]
File: 71 KB, 1024x576, whooo cares.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56607029

>>56606920
Makes me think of that microdick TraderXO and his crew of other fat muslims on CX. Two months ago or so he was calling for mid $2s. Insisting on it actually, constantly teasing, oblivious bear euphoria. I wish I took more screenshots. I distinctly remember when he "tested to see if there were any LINK marines left" and the coke-addled (true) phrasing he used, like "IF you give me sub $3 I might become a marine, keyword MIGHT".
>430k followers

Go search his history now. That fag has deleted every single tweet in his history containing $LINK or Chainlink or anything else.

>> No.55914984 [View]
File: 71 KB, 1024x576, whooo cares.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55914984

>>55913998
Well that ended the party quickly kek

>> No.55547325 [View]
File: 71 KB, 1024x576, whooo cares.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55547325

>>55543582
Probably with all the gains they made while LINK was dudding around through a massive year-long bullrun.

>> No.55416466 [View]
File: 71 KB, 1024x576, whooo cares.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55416466

>>55408622
I know this is a bagholder cope thread - but titerally a sniff of double digits and I'm out of here. After the 2020-2023 experience, I'd be a gigaretard not to place my bets on other horses. Maybe I'll hold a little and just scale out based on macro indicators, but LINK no longer outperforms the market. You cunts were spoiled for 3 years and got rekted -- broaden your horizons

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]