/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55327951
This. Recently there was a very detailed 3D scan done of the wreck and "historians" and "experts" are now in full damage-control and COPE mode, changing their story trying to explain away the lack of evidence of the ship hitting an iceberg. Until now the narrative has always been "ummm well it's there but we just can't see it because it's so difficult to make things out due to the low light and poor video quality etc and it's very expensive and difficult to dive down there and film stuff so you should be satisfied with the footage you've gotten" and now that that excuse isn't possible anymore they've changed their narrative to "w-well the reason we can't see the evidence is because a-actually the damage was never there b-b-b-BUT an iceberg totally did damage and sink the ship, but it happened differently than what we've been saying all this time and you just can't see the damage because it's lower and hidden in the mud... y-yeah, that's it..."

Related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OOq_SsYd5Q