/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49692689
unfortunately wakarimasen got nuked so you can no longer explore the threads that responded to this when it was first made. It's basically a compilation of all copy pasta FUD that was posted when AVAX dumped to $9 after the double mint.

I guess I can humor you and just point out some really easily disproved lies
>AVAX logo stolen
lmao see pic, figure out which company stole it first
>chainlink memes
there is heavy cross-over of linkies because LINK and AVAX are both IC3 coins. AVAX's first exposure to /biz/ was because of an interview between Sergey and Emin
>it seems Avalanche does not even support cross-subnet transactions(lmao)
X, C, and P all are technically subnets and have swapped AVAX tokens from the very beginning
>all subnets are permissioned = centralised control
simply wrong, subnets are permissionless by default, but can be created as permissioned if the subnet designer wants. They can even run PoW if you set the parameters to that, designed to be customizable to the extreme.
>non-history preserving consensus, DAG storage could be wiped out by bug, no longest chain rule
I think this fud was originally made to criticize FTM because it doesn't apply to AVAX at all. currently all nodes are archival nodes, only the x-chain is a DAG, and the longest chain rule applies to P and C. Also finality is absolute anyways on Avalanche consensus so longest chain rule doesn't even matter.
>validator IPs are explicitly locked with staking power
flat out wrong, validators are locked to security certificates, IPs can change or be dynamic. plenty of people run nodes from home on dynamic IPs

>>49355612
AVAX's largest subnet LUNA crashed to zero and it's second largest subnet SOL keeps crashing.

>>49267469
What is it?