/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>5378199
>because it's the natural state of man
lol? The natural state of man is a hunter-gather and a subsistence farmer. You can just build your house anywhere because private property (capitalism) is a thing now. Before this we had things like the commons, but again, capitalism happened and moved people away from being farmers to working in factories and paying landlord rents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclosure_Acts

>capitalism hasn't yet (enough) arrived.
They already have capitalism though, they went through privatization, it's just they're indebted to the first world.

You sure did a lot mental gymnastics to avoid the fact that poor people are poor simply because they don't own things.

>no, these kind of policies are usually implemented to guarantee an income for farmers
Yes, because the government was forced to do something about the economic system their living in (capitalism).

>>5378199
>nationalisation is integral part of the economic system
A nation and a type of economic system are two independent things. The point is you're trying to argue against an economic system by pointing out things that aren't caused by it. If you have a problem with revolution then say you have a problem with revolution and not said economic system.

>I don't get though what this has to do
I'm pointing out how history can explain why things happens instead of putting all the blame on a group of people you don't like. And can you explain how it was mass murder when there wasn't intent?

>I do not even know what country you're talking about. but somehow I can't shake the feeling off I'm going to have to reply with 'that wasn't even close to capitalism

They were socialist revolutions so you can only guess what type of system they were trying to escape.

>https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Workshop_SOEsDevelopmentProcess_India.pdf
That's not how it works, you have to point out where the source says the economy is predominantly socially owned.