/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58156868
>GME is fucking dead
>you losers are keeping it alive with your own money
What did he mean by this?

>>58028769
>What's stopping them from closing those at a loss, even if it's $12.75/share?
The fact that the vast majority of their shorts were opened for years at less than $6, which explains why (((analysts))) are so desperate to claim GME fair value is exactly $6.
>That's really not a lot for them,
Oh yes it is, especially if you've been fucking the cookie jar with a short interest of 226%
>especially since I'm sure they've shorted all the way down.
Shorting on the way down doesn't negate the losses on their shorts opened below $6.
>The people saying GME play had no time frame were the shills all along desu.
How exactly? How are we shills if we're isolated in this thread? If this situation keeps going on, more shares will be bought, and the company will only be profitable going forward, so there's ZERO chance of bankruptcy. And if the price did somehow crash to $6, why wouldn't I slurp that delectable dip? GME itself has been crabbing for over a month now, it's simply a good buy no matter what.