/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54779947
I know UOF was worked out to be ANStothemoon which btw made me kek to the high heavens because I KNEW all along there was a good proportion of fud coming from salty NEO holders. I could just fucking tell.
Anyway, I don't think there's any proof dudeposter = UOF. I don't really subscribe to the whole locus-of-fud theories. I think there are swathes of demoralised holders who've turned on it. I should know because I did the same in 2021 after I tried to encourage anons to hype and see that triple digits was not some ridiculous proposition (literally just needed to go from #13 to #8 if you calculate it using contemporary supply and market dominance data*) and all I got back was sooky emo shit. So I thought fuck you all I'll start fudding too.

*#13: LINK | $40 | supply 426m (517m now) | MC=17.1b | 0.78% market share
#8: DOT | MC=42.6bn | 1.81% market share.

At DOT's market cap at that point in time, LINK would have been at $100.
What's crazy: total crypto MC would only have been $2.3T [=(1/0.0181)*42.6m]. This is based on April/May data. That's 23% less than the market ATH that came months later, when DOT's market cap was fucking $55bn (LINK=$125). Yet the miserable cunts here made out that LINK going to $100 was outside the realm of possibility. Just bizarre.