/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>4166430

>>4120814

>>4107879
Because its not a fucking shitcoin its a 4 year plus development coin that released with a working product already finished and partnerships with banks trading trillions of dollars every day and swift had been already using their tech in internal testing.

I can't blame anyone that went all in on link because it made complete logical sense for this to be insane 10x at least.
But sadly crypto doesn't work based on actual partnerships and good tech its all about shilling empty hype and skateboard stickers.

>>3937124
I mean yeah its precisely why i don't want to sell even though i don't see it moving anything other than sideways at best until something big drops like a new exchange or news.
But I know the minute that does happen it'll jump like 50% instantly and I don't want to have to buy in with less link than I originally had

>>3760188
Can't agree with you with OMG anon, its just a shitcoin with a bunch of empty promises and excellent dev shilling. Still has a long way it could drop yet, it was extremely overhyped.
I'm really glad to see chainlink not making the same mistakes and building hype naturally and legitimately.

Time for fudding was 2 weeks ago guys, coin is getting too big and getting more known across the crypto scene.

Buy back now or fomo back in and lose half the stack you started with later, you aren't fooling anyone

>>3668685
lol. this question is not going to be relevant for another few months.

Could it be that LINK is too good for us sinners and only the righteous among us have been blessed with hands of the gods, steady enough to hold until 200x?