/biz/ - Business & Finance

>Nooo you can't change bitcoin because le whitepaper is le perfect
>But we can't follow the whitepaper on this one we just can't, bitcoin needs to be secured by quantum physmics and moores butthole!!
Name me something more pathetic than a bitcoiner. At least the retard who buys doge or similar tokens knows how stupid it is, surely.

Definitely not! There's nothing to suggest that bitcoin is a shell of it's former self failing to achieve the original project goals! Nothing at all! Hodl hodl moon lambo!

>>54539374
worthless manipulated shell of "peer to peer digital cash"

>>54429766
You are fucking retarded and I fucking hate you and I wish painful death on all number go up bitcoin faggots trying to LARP as if they give a shit about the ideals that cryptocurrency had. YOU are a fucking pest and need to be shot for even suggesting this bullshit. Bitcoin was not created as a vehicle for investment or "with the intent of having the price floor go up every cycle" you subhuman fucking roach. Bitcoin WAS meant to be peer to peer electronic cash before you and subhumans like you allowed bitcoin to be coopted into the shell of it's potential that it is today.

FUCK OFF AND DIE. GENUINELY FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART.

>>54327015
>Also new asics increasing hashrate massively
Failed project. Just like bitcoin.

>>54326567
the only thing stopping bitcoin from being called a security is the fact that it is controlled by the feds. It is a failure and has diverted from its original goals.

Bitcoin maxi's are literally just moonfags with no alignment to what bitcoin originally stood for. Now that the project is failed and coopted they just want their bags to pump so they can buy le lambo. Fuck all of them. They are spineless subhumans with no ideals.

>>54197885
Maxi cope. Your project is a failure.

>>54190450
bitcoin doesn't even function as a currency. failure of a project.

>>54103657
>It's not because a pool or someone has 51% of the hashrate that they GUARANTEED will mine all the next blocks and maintain a longer chain. Have you never mined or was part of a "lucky" pool who mined a bunch of blocks with little effort?

It doesn't matter. If you take the expected value for how many "wins" the 51% side will get over the "wins" the 49% side will get, eventually the 51% side wins out and is able to conduct an attack. I know we are talking about Monero, but the analysis of such an attack is available in the bitcoin whitepaper and is more of a discussion on general PoW block races.
>Ironically, it also mentions bitcoin being 1 CPU 1 vote, how sad satoshi would be if he were here to see how they have bastardized bitcoin

>>54105366
This analysis is good, but ignores the fact that any such prolonged attack would be catastrophic to Monero. Even if the community could re-organize and hard fork against a big chain (the attack I suggested) Monero would be abandoned. There would simply be no trust in the chain.