/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53584900
>He literally told people that sacrificing LUNC was a good thing.
No he didn't. Not defending Ed's autism, but he joined in because the excuse was "It's the fastest but most painful way, minting trillions more LUNC to repeg USTC." Then once USTC repegs, the LUNC would burn by itself going to $2-3 max without working utilities or swaps.

They're useful codemonkey retards but they shouldn't be demanding funds when they advertised they'd work for free and believe in LUNC to make it in 2 years. What keeps Zaradar coding now is because if he upsets CZ again, Binance will pull out and crash the whole chain if they press the sell button.

>>53322919
Just know this. If it's one thing you don't do, you don't fuck with a billionaire's money. Zaradar taking CZ's stash and using it as liquidity for TUNA's play is gonna end up badly for him.

>>53288814
We're gonna have to wait on CZ Binance to do some "legal" talking to Zaradar. Remember, if they pull back on the burns or suddenly drop their 30% of the supply, LUNC and LUNA will be dead forever.

Zaradar betrayed himself on giving up the idea of burn swaps as the main source of the burns. Then scoffs at the idea of Binance helping them code LUNC with their own devs. When in reality, Binance carried this whole community Day 1 of the crash.

TL;DR - He's fucking with the wrong guy, knowing CZ's supply would get shafted for TUNA.