/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58331517
Merkelig nok så var det jeg som skrev det og ikke jeg som delte det bilde selv om det hender jeg også laster opp det bilde her. Jeg vet ikke så mye om han, men han har søte kattejente puter så han kan ikke være en slem person.

>>53076263
For a while I thought about whether I should post this, but I'm going to do it anyway.
Please, realise you're on an anonymous imageboard where being anonymous is the default, what matters here is not your reputation, your name or your past, what matters is what you are able to contribute to the conversation or discussion.
Stutter anon as you call her has chosen to remain anonymous and it's therefore likely she wants to remain anonymous, you should stop calling people out and stay on topic.
If you cannot do that, other types of discussion platforms might be more suitable for you.

>>xxxx219 (You)
When I spoke about love last thread, I found it to be quite a coincidence that (You) posted about it a few minutes afterwards, even though I didn't get a (You) I felt like it was aimed at me because of the subject.
Perhaps I'm imagining things but I cannot shake the feeling there was suggestive undertone in there, mainly due the words "pretentious game".
I take ethics very seriously, now the ^above will look like I'm trying to prove a point, maybe things would have turned out different had history been different.
Different perspectives are fine, they are great even, they deserve praise and love.
However, love for all is not unconditional, it's conditional.
The conditions are written in the old book, in general they should be common knowledge; just do good.
Do good, and you will receive love.

>>53076263
The TL:DR is that I am stutter anon.