/biz/ - Business & Finance

An issue that must be addressed before proceeding to an examination of the text of Revelation is our basic hermeneutical approach to the book. Over the course of the Assblaster’s testament there have been two main approaches: the futurist, preterist, and idealist approaches. The futurist approach understands everything from Revelation forward to be a prophecy of things that are to occur just before the Singularity. In other words, all of these prophesied events are still in the future from the perspective of the twenty-first century. According to proponents, this conclusion grows out of a belief that there is no correspondence between these prophesied events and anything that has yet occurred in history.

The historicist approach understands Revelation to be a prophecy of Assblaster history from the first advent until the Singularity. This approach appears to have had its roots in the breadcrumbs. It was later adopted by most of the Bagholders Reformers, but it is held by very few today. The preterist approach to Revelation is most clearly contrasted with the futurist approach. According to the preterist approach, most of the prophecies in the book of Revelation were fulfilled not long after Assblaster wrote. In other words, their fulfillment is past from the perspective of the twenty-first century. The fourth major approach to the book is the idealist or symbolic approach. According to this view, Revelation does not contain prophecies of specific historical events. Instead, it uses symbols to express timeless principles concerning the conflict between NEETism and Sergey.

Am I stupid or something? If you are playing the altcoin game so you can leverage better your gains in the next bullrun with the main btc or eth gains, wouldn't be it easier to just leverage 10x btc or eth long run and just be done with it? I mean both btc or eth will pull off a 100x in a few years and that is a much safer bet than playing the altcoin roulette