/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29392044
Based helpful footfriend. I look forward to your posts too and will keep what you say in mind as we make money. Have some feet too.

>>29392048
fuck it, I will abstain from the play unless it goes down more, I much rather not have to worry about margin and remain moderately dipping into it rather than balls deep.

Thank you based horse

>>20051199
Did the general dissolve because people liquidated or what

How down are you?

>>20049291
Leftoids are subhumans who are authoritarian racists parading under the guise of being "the good guys" and "anti-facist"

Real talk my man

How are your stocks holding up today boys

>>19615752
Starting price for day old 1 photo is probably 25. Operating costs are actually high, 25 might barely profit if at all. Our business model obviously depends on the whales, the connoisseurs. Selling longer days worn, pairing bathwater with it, multi-person used socks, all of this is products for those who truly want to exercise demand, meaning much higher mark ups. 25-500 dollars easily with ranges, easily. Maybe higher.

>>19615978
If this business model became real, I would maintain that general. But for this one I can't lie, sorry but my autism is out of control.

>>19480837
Yea, end of the day had some hope. Too bad STNG didn't bounce back any. Too bad since my price to break even there is 17.5.

>>19166331
Not that fucked. Just not too much upside comparatively.

>>19166894
The general has actual paid shills. Proven newfags who also let it slip out about multiple people conspiring with them, all with talking points kek. People are....a little peeved, don't take it personal.

>>19165478
I am betting boom on...Wednesday. FRO earnings are the most anticipated by hedgies. If before, it is possible. But in general I don't care, they are a value play at this point. Stocks will at least go to NAV even among the most bearish you can be...in which case is a profit on like all tankers but NAT. Dividends cover losses and are guaranteed, rates secured, if I wanted to gamble on stocks going up or down I have plenty of high volume options. I am betting tankers as companies at this point. Their worth inherently is more than right now, rapidly deleveraging, dividends high, buybacks possible, and potential to go up due to actually being a good business. Plus decent rates are secured due to scrap dates which ensures low tanker supply thus increasing demand and rates while lowering cost. In this volatile market, they are good companies to invest in regardless of price speculation. You know....as actual smart investors not gambling. The fact we can also gamble it going sky high is a huge bonus. And I think FRO is the liftoff signal. Anything before is a bonus.

>>19143654
>You call it stalling, they call it a solution
Top fucking kek. But if they did contract them, we will basically have eternal bragging rights on /biz/ forever when these things shoot up beyond any previous conception imaginable.

>>19143715
>Governments having a bidding war with firms for renting out tankers for oil storage
lmfao, made my day imagining that. Imagine if insiders knew this was in Trump's plan already so have been pushing the price down on purpose so they can buy millions of shares when this starts and this was their big plan. I doubt it would ever happen, highly doubt. But if it did we would see FOMO like you would never believe and half of us would become millionaires.