/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11943085
off binance is bullish because its no longer being traded, instead, the whale wants to hoard more link. they probably will be accumulating more on binance. anons should always keep their stack off of an exchange. instead put your stack into a wallet and keep your json files in numerous places/devices. nice hodling linkmarines.

>>11724698
to freedom! march!

>>11590412
Thank you based Serg

>>11587588
thank you for sharing.

>>5378598
>>5378932
could somebody explain the cup and handle sign??

>>4787655

Im going to tell you guys right know. MINE CHAINLINK! MINE ETH TO BUY CHAINLINK. WAIT TO KILL THE CALF UNTIL SERGEY LIFTS US ALL TO THE PROMISED LAND OF MOON. As of right now I will mine the 10 x gtx 1070's in my room to mine on nanopool every week it will spit me out 0.2 ETH to my etherscan/etherdelta account. From there I will buy how ever much chainlink I can for the coming of times. Think about it? its ether cuckbase fees or creating the hard labour of your megacomputer to buy CL. you are going to have to cover the electric bill YES, but STILL LOOK AT THE FUNDAMENTALS, ITS THERE, ITS ALL THERE

If you guys think about it, every single ICO coming out recently has failed magnificently and is unironically heading below ICO.

But why is this token still up an organic 4x from presale and 3.5x from crowdsale?

What will happen with Request?

>>3904675
>>3904717
Do you enjoy trying to push 45 cents and seeing it go back down and go back up and go back down?

Thanks for your money.

>>3807968

you know this shit was legit when OP never came back with a reply after typing that beautiful narrative. i fully stand behind LINK and what it means for the world of crypto pic rel

Don't forget Chainlink is one of the few coins out there with a working product.

1. Eth and smartcontracts. We all know smartcontracts are revolutoinary, but their use cases are limited. Smartcontracts are awesome, but they are confined within the blockchain and data on the blockchain. In otherwords, right now smartcontracts are "you send 1 eth and I'll send back 1000 McTokens", and this contract is verifiable/trustless/amazing but its stuck within the universe of Ethereum and the data Ethereum understands

2. It is possible to use external data to inform these contracts, but right now that process is centralized. This is a problem. Lets say the external data is a transaction of Dollars for ETH. So you send 300$ to bank account X, and then I send one Eth to your address. Right now you either do that through a third party (CoinBase), OTC (LocalBitcoins) or whatever else centrlized system you want to use.

Knocking out that centralization, where you have to trust someone, is THE key to SmartContracts having a real world use case. But how do you get that information -- the fact that the $300 has been sent -- onto the blockchain using data that the smartcontract understands?

3. Oracles. Right now the answer is "hey we can hire Oracle X to do the translation to represent this bank dollar transaction on the blockchain." The "oracle problem" with this is that you are 100% TRUSTING that oracle to act prudently. That they don't tamper with the data. So we can kill coinbase but now we have to trust the oracle instead of coinbase .This is a HUGE problem for Banks who want to get into blockchain but have to trust a centralized oracle to translate data. This Oracle can be hacked, falsified or defrauded.

>>3780205

>>3735763
NP anon, have another fresh off the presses.

0xe92072dB1F4dE50C6Cd438785dab81b8044Ec8cd