[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.5076250 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, 1507585696140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5076250

Dont you ever, ever lump a shit coin like ARK into beautiful REQ and LINK

>> No.4387881 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, 1507585696140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4387881

>18

>Zero Ark

>> No.4376416 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, 1507585696140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4376416

CONTINUED

>ICON which seems to be a (several) proprietary blockchain(s), is comparing itself to protocols like Bancor. (While misleadingly saying that Bancor's consensus mechanism is PoW)
The link to the white-paper of the Loop Fault tolerance algorithm (LFT) which is the consensus mechanism for ICON, re-directs to an empty repository. The only reference we could find is a link to an Apache FLINK improvement proposal. This makes us doubt that LFT was developed by ICON. Fucking. Scam.

>Established competitors in active development like COSMOS (which is partnered with BOSCOIN)

>20% yearly inflation is something un-heard of in the crypto-space & even central bank cuck fiat currencies.

YOURE LOSING 20% A YEAR AUTOMATICALLY WHAT THE LITERAL FUCK ARE THEY FUCKING THINKING

>No vesting mentioned for the team's tokens.

>Team has 6 product managers. SIX. Too dedicated to shill to you.

If you bought into ICON in the presale I am sorry to hear.

>> No.4254486 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, deluded bitcoiners.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4254486

this one

>> No.3930730 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, deluded odies.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3930730

>>3930425

>> No.3930013 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, 1507585696140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3930013

>>3929790
Cope harder, AirHead

>> No.3886149 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, 1507585696140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3886149

"cant allow" "give permission"

wtf kind of centralized-speak language is that

>> No.3822923 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, 1507585696140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3822923

APOLOGIZE

>> No.3807954 [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, very deluded.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3807954

>>3807874
never

>> No.3746264 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 128 KB, 297x263, very deluded.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3746264

>>3746216

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]