/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10254465
>>10254490

>>10133165
maybe because moving any of those coins is a violation of the legal entity they are entrusted to?
or maybe because he knows proof of life from satoshi would cause market panic. or maybe because he has so many bitcoins across so many wallets that people don't even know about that he has so much money he could never spend it in 10 lifetimes, so he doesn't bother touching any of the early coins that are obviously linked with him.

>>8883620
>>8883602

you're not gonna see a public proof involving moving of early coins or signing of blocks (revealing the holder of the satoshi key publicly) Either would be a violation of the legal trust terms.

to you brainlets wondering why there hasn't been a public cryptographic signing proof or moving of the coins.. any coin movement or definitive proof of who owns the satoshi keys would be a violation of the Tulip Trust legal terms and CSW's claim to the coins becomes null. You aren't going to see public proof before at least Jan 2020.

>>8291200
>>The BCH camp moves some coins from Satoshi's original wallet during conference

heh I wish, but that would violate the terms of the Tulip Trust. so unless that trust is null and void now I don't see it happening before 2020

>>8012898
read the tulip trust document. if the identity of the holder of satoshi keys is identified publicly, then the legal trust has been violated. that is why there will be no public proof or coins moving until January 2020 at the earliest

>>7999618
firstly, the 50 bitcoins generated in the genesis block cannot be moved. Secondly, (pic related) is why satoshi coins have not and will not be moved before 2020.