/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9316108
That's not what I implied at all, the original bitcoin is just fine.
It's believing in your shitty kiked version that is evidence of idiocy, as if anymore were required from a fuckwit who has demonstrably fallen victim to the "muh govment says its bad so its bad tarnations!" meme, seemingly lacking the awareness that you're in an explicitly ancap project that was designed to destroy all governments and their central banking lackeys.

>>9098592
> the most centralized nodes on the network.
AHahahhahahahahahahh fuck me.. do you listen to yourself son or have you mastered the art of doublethink so well that this doesn't even scratch your skin?
It's over greg. You lost. Go to sleep.

>>9086434
You don't seem to understand. BCH won the moment segwit2x was cancelled. The rest is just the world catching up to that reality, it's already over, you just don't know it yet.

> Are you thinking of the lightning video that cashie dude made?
Right, Falkvinge's summary of lightning and the many problems with which it is afflicted. He is correct. I personally know and have attended many presentations from the guy who has been struggling trying to put pig on this particular lipstick since inception, he's skeptical and pessimistic that it can be done exactly because of the reasons Falkvinge goes over in that video, the routing problems are indeed on the level of anti-gravity in terms of complexity, nobody has a fucking clue how to solve them, those are the facts, and yes, because lightning channels are stateful when it comes to encapsulated funds, it makes it an even more complex problem than it would otherwise be.
> And my position is that the BTCP debacle contradicts that.
An exit scam is pocketing the funds with which you were as an entity entrusted with in order to execute on a particular plan in future. So, there's a whole raft of ways in which the BTCP situation doesn't match up to that definition.
Firstly, It's an open source piece of software that if the participants within and holders so chose, they could easily fork themselves in order to execute upon it, even if you want to venture the hypothesis that they didn't actually deliver what they promised.
Secondly, they *did* deliver what they actually promised. They executed a merger of the ZCL and BTC ledgers and added zksnarks for anonymity, so your supposed "exit scam" is an exit scam in the sense that they actually did exactly what they said they would do, but the market didn't particularly like it, due to either exchange takeup or general market interest, so what? If I offer to manage an open source distributed effort to build you a car, and I've already shown you the plans for it, and I say I intend to also weld in this here open source automated driving system, and then I do, and then you try to sell that car but nobody wants to buy it, did I exit scam you? Fuck no.(c)

>>7712896

>>7641095
>>7641117
You summoned them OP

>>7620778
>clueless idiocy

Is there a way to get market wide VWAP for a particular token excluding a particular counterparty? For example the price of ETH excluding all ETHBTC volume?

What will it take to make them understand? The bleed is tainting assets not at all responsible for their idiocy, it's getting pretty annoying desu.